# On Diagnostics for Understanding Agent Training Behaviour in Cooperative MARL

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08468 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08468/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01955/) (2021)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.13264/) (2021)
- [Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08926/) (2017)
- [QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11485/) (2018)
- [The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04043/) (2019)
- [Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05296/) (2017)
- [Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11180/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07869/) (2020)
- [MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07483/) (2019)
- [Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.06247/) (2020)
- [ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Roles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08039/) (2020)
- [Shared Experience Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07169/) (2020)
- [Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.06693/) (2020)
- [Towards a Standardised Performance Evaluation Protocol for Cooperative MARL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10485/) (2022)
- [A Game-Theoretic Model and Best-Response Learning Method for Ad Hoc Coordination in Multiagent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01170/) (2015)
- [Reasoning about Hypothetical Agent Behaviours and their Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11064/) (2019)
- [Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Broad-XAI: A Conceptual Framework and Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.09003/) (2021)
- [Cooperative Assistance in Robotic Surgery through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04857/) (2021)
- [Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05683/) (2022)
- [LIGS: Learnable Intrinsic-Reward Generation Selection for Multi-Agent Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02618/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Explaining Decisions of Agents in Mixed-Motive Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15255/) (2024)
- [Interpretable Failure Analysis in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08104/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has made substantial strides in addressing the distributed decision-making challenges. However, as multi-agent systems grow in complexity, gaining a comprehensive understanding of their behaviour becomes increasingly challenging. Conventionally, tracking team rewards over time has served as a pragmatic measure to gauge the effectiveness of agents in learning optimal policies. Nevertheless, we argue that relying solely on the empirical returns may obscure crucial insights into agent behaviour. In this paper, we explore the application of explainable AI (XAI) tools to gain profound insights into agent behaviour. We employ these diagnostics tools within the context of Level-Based Foraging and Multi-Robot Warehouse environments and apply them to a diverse array of MARL algorithms. We demonstrate how our diagnostics can enhance the interpretability and explainability of MARL systems, providing a better understanding of agent behaviour.
