# Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Crate

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07852 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07852/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Provenance Tracking in Large-Scale Machine Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01075/) (2025)
- [Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences (October 2025 -- Version 2)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16619/) (2025)
- [Clarus: Coordinating Autonomous Research Agents toward Web-Scale Scientific Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.30246/) (2026)
- [Constructing Executable Analytical Knowledge Representations for Meta-Analysis Synthesis Using an Agentic Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.01711/) (2026)
- [Workflow Cards: Structured Summaries of Workflow Executions Using Provenance Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11022/) (2026)
- [Traceable Trust for action-ready artificial intelligence in bioscience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.17997/) (2026)
- [A Policy Profile for Croissant: Refusal as a Property of the Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19640/) (2026)
- [K-Dense BYOK: An Open-Source AI Research Assistant That Runs Locally and Keeps a Hash-Chained Lab Notebook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00074/) (2026)
- [AIPOCH Open-Science: An Open-Source AI Research Workbench with Reproducible .science Packages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17110/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recording the provenance of scientific computation results is key to the support of traceability, reproducibility and quality assessment of data products. Several data models have been explored to address this need, providing representations of workflow plans and their executions as well as means of packaging the resulting information for archiving and sharing. However, existing approaches tend to lack interoperable adoption across workflow management systems. In this work we present Workflow Run RO-Crate, an extension of RO-Crate (Research Object Crate) and Schema.org to capture the provenance of the execution of computational workflows at different levels of granularity and bundle together all their associated objects (inputs, outputs, code, etc.). The model is supported by a diverse, open community that runs regular meetings, discussing development, maintenance and adoption aspects. Workflow Run RO-Crate is already implemented by several workflow management systems, allowing interoperable comparisons between workflow runs from heterogeneous systems. We describe the model, its alignment to standards such as W3C PROV, and its implementation in six workflow systems. Finally, we illustrate the application of Workflow Run RO-Crate in two use cases of machine learning in the digital image analysis domain. A corresponding RO-Crate for this article is at https://w3id.org/ro/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10368989