# Exploiting Representation Bias for Data Distillation in Abstractive Text Summarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06022 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06022/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.3215/) (2014)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.06023/) (2016)
- [Multi-News: a Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset and Abstractive Hierarchical Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01749/) (2019)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.10792/) (2018)
- [Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08712/) (2020)
- [Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12854/) (2022)
- [Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09061/) (2021)
- [Improving Zero and Few-Shot Abstractive Summarization with Intermediate Fine-tuning and Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12836/) (2020)
- [Adapting the Neural Encoder-Decoder Framework from Single to Multi-Document Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06218/) (2018)
- [Earlier Isn't Always Better: Sub-aspect Analysis on Corpus and System Biases in Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11723/) (2019)
- [Coloring the Blank Slate: Pre-training Imparts a Hierarchical Inductive Bias to Sequence-to-sequence Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.09397/) (2022)
- [Learning to Revise References for Faithful Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10290/) (2022)
- [Minimize Exposure Bias of Seq2Seq Models in Joint Entity and Relation Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07503/) (2020)
- [What they do when in doubt: a study of inductive biases in seq2seq learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14953/) (2020)
- [A Closer Look at Data Bias in Neural Extractive Summarization Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13705/) (2019)
- [See, Hear, Read: Leveraging Multimodality with Guided Attention for Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09601/) (2021)
- [CQASUMM: Building References for Community Question Answering Summarization Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04884/) (2018)
- [Corpora Evaluation and System Bias Detection in Multi-document Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01786/) (2020)
- [Fusing Multimodal Signals on Hyper-complex Space for Extreme Abstractive Text Summarization (TL;DR) of Scientific Contents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13968/) (2023)
- [Subjective Bias in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10084/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Abstractive text summarization is surging with the number of training samples to cater to the needs of the deep learning models. These models tend to exploit the training data representations to attain superior performance by improving the quantitative element of the resultant summary. However, increasing the size of the training set may not always be the ideal solution to maximize the performance, and therefore, a need to revisit the quality of training samples and the learning protocol of deep learning models is a must. In this paper, we aim to discretize the vector space of the abstractive text summarization models to understand the characteristics learned between the input embedding space and the models' encoder space. We show that deep models fail to capture the diversity of the input space. Further, the distribution of data points on the encoder space indicates that an unchecked increase in the training samples does not add value; rather, a tear-down of data samples is highly needed to make the models focus on variability and faithfulness. We employ clustering techniques to learn the diversity of a model's sample space and how data points are mapped from the embedding space to the encoder space and vice versa. Further, we devise a metric to filter out redundant data points to make the model more robust and less data hungry. We benchmark our proposed method using quantitative metrics, such as Rouge, and qualitative metrics, such as BERTScore, FEQA and Pyramid score. We also quantify the reasons that inhibit the models from learning the diversity from the varied input samples.