# A Representative Study on Human Detection of Artificially Generated Media Across Countries

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05976 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05976/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 50 of its 130 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 50)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04948/) (2018)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0473/) (2014)
- [Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.1078/) (2014)
- [Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09672/) (2021)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10196/) (2017)
- [Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.3215/) (2014)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.11096/) (2018)
- [Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00028/) (2017)
- [Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.1784/) (2014)
- [Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06434/) (2015)
- [Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05957/) (2018)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [HiFi-GAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Efficient and High Fidelity Speech Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05646/) (2020)
- [CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11035/) (2019)
- [Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05884/) (2017)
- [Wasserstein GAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.07875/) (2017)
- [Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Clues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09355/) (2020)
- [Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08685/) (2020)
- [MelGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Conditional Waveform Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06711/) (2019)
- [Parallel WaveGAN: A fast waveform generation model based on generative adversarial networks with multi-resolution spectrogram](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11480/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Deepfake-Eval-2024: A Multi-Modal In-the-Wild Benchmark of Deepfakes Circulated in 2024](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02857/) (2025)
- [On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00025/) (2024)
- [Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03214/) (2024)
- [AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14244/) (2024)
- [Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04097/) (2024)
- [Adversarial Robustness of AI-Generated Image Detectors in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01574/) (2024)
- [Adoption of Watermarking for Generative AI Systems in Practice and Implications under the new EU AI Act](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18156/) (2025)
- [The Cat and Mouse Game: The Ongoing Arms Race Between Diffusion Models and Detection Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18866/) (2024)
- [RAID: A Dataset for Testing the Adversarial Robustness of AI-Generated Image Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03988/) (2025)
- [Gen-Review: A Large-scale Dataset of AI-Generated (and Human-written) Peer Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21192/) (2025)
- ["That's another doom I haven't thought about": A User Study on AI Labels as a Safeguard Against Image-Based Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22845/) (2025)
- [Humans can learn to detect AI-generated texts, or at least learn when they can't](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01877/) (2025)
- [Designing Effective Digital Literacy Interventions for Boosting Deepfake Discernment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23492/) (2025)
- [PRADA: Probability-Ratio-Based Attribution and Detection of Autoregressive-Generated Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20068/) (2025)
- [Human-AI Ensembles Improve Deepfake Detection in Low-to-Medium Quality Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14658/) (2026)
- [DeGenTWeb: A First Look at LLM-dominant Websites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00087/) (2026)
- [The Future of Facts: Tracing the Factual Generation-Verification Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27564/) (2026)
- [BIAS-ID: A Framework for Analyzing Transformation Biases in AI-Generated Image Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31153/) (2026)
- [Generative Propaganda](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.19147/) (2025)
- [Show, Don't TELL: Explainable AI-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27921/) (2026)
- [Can You Trust What You See? Human and AI Detection of Synthetic Legal Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.07613/) (2026)
- [Frontier vision-language models have overtaken young adults at detecting AI-generated portraits -- but not their calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30210/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

AI-generated media has become a threat to our digital society as we know it. These forgeries can be created automatically and on a large scale based on publicly available technology. Recognizing this challenge, academics and practitioners have proposed a multitude of automatic detection strategies to detect such artificial media. However, in contrast to these technical advances, the human perception of generated media has not been thoroughly studied yet. In this paper, we aim at closing this research gap. We perform the first comprehensive survey into people's ability to detect generated media, spanning three countries (USA, Germany, and China) with 3,002 participants across audio, image, and text media. Our results indicate that state-of-the-art forgeries are almost indistinguishable from "real" media, with the majority of participants simply guessing when asked to rate them as human- or machine-generated. In addition, AI-generated media receive is voted more human like across all media types and all countries. To further understand which factors influence people's ability to detect generated media, we include personal variables, chosen based on a literature review in the domains of deepfake and fake news research. In a regression analysis, we found that generalized trust, cognitive reflection, and self-reported familiarity with deepfakes significantly influence participant's decision across all media categories.