# Domain Adaptation of a State of the Art Text-to-SQL Model: Lessons Learned and Challenges Found

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05448 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05448/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Cost](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04235/) (2018)
- [PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05093/) (2021)
- [UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05966/) (2022)
- [CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05378/) (2019)
- [SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02285/) (2019)
- [Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12627/) (2020)
- [Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12773/) (2020)
- [Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01065/) (2021)
- [Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05157/) (2021)
- [Text-to-SQL in the Wild: A Naturally-Occurring Dataset Based on Stack Exchange Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05006/) (2021)
- [Model-based Interactive Semantic Parsing: A Unified Framework and A Text-to-SQL Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.05389/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

There are many recent advanced developments for the Text-to-SQL task, where the Picard model is one of the the top performing models as measured by the Spider dataset competition. However, bringing Text-to-SQL systems to realistic use-cases through domain adaptation remains a tough challenge. We analyze how well the base T5 Language Model and Picard perform on query structures different from the Spider dataset, we fine-tuned the base model on the Spider data and on independent databases (DB). To avoid accessing the DB content online during inference, we also present an alternative way to disambiguate the values in an input question using a rule-based approach that relies on an intermediate representation of the semantic concepts of an input question. In our results we show in what cases T5 and Picard can deliver good performance, we share the lessons learned, and discuss current domain adaptation challenges.