# LaCour!: Enabling Research on Argumentation in Hearings of the European Court of Human Rights

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05061 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05061/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11477/) (2020)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05794/) (2022)
- [LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11462/) (2023)
- [LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00976/) (2021)
- [Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02059/) (2019)
- [pyannote.audio: neural building blocks for speaker diarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.01255/) (2019)
- [Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00220/) (2022)
- [LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law School](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02559/) (2020)
- [LeXFiles and LegalLAMA: Facilitating English Multinational Legal Language Model Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07507/) (2023)
- [Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06178/) (2022)
- [Legal and Political Stance Detection of SCOTUS Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11724/) (2022)
- [A Computational Analysis of Oral Argument in the Supreme Court](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05373/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Mining Legal Arguments to Study Judicial Formalism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11374/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Why does an argument end up in the final court decision? Was it deliberated or questioned during the oral hearings? Was there something in the hearings that triggered a particular judge to write a dissenting opinion? Despite the availability of the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), none of these legal research questions can currently be answered as the ECHR's multilingual oral hearings are not transcribed, structured, or speaker-attributed. We address this fundamental gap by presenting LaCour!, the first corpus of textual oral arguments of the ECHR, consisting of 154 full hearings (2.1 million tokens from over 267 hours of video footage) in English, French, and other court languages, each linked to the corresponding final judgment documents. In addition to the transcribed and partially manually corrected text from the video, we provide sentence-level timestamps and manually annotated role and language labels. We also showcase LaCour! in a set of preliminary experiments that explore the interplay between questions and dissenting opinions. Apart from the use cases in legal NLP, we hope that law students or other interested parties will also use LaCour! as a learning resource, as it is freely available in various formats at https://huggingface.co/datasets/TrustHLT/LaCour.