# Think from Words(TFW): Initiating Human-Like Cognition in Large Language Models Through Think from Words for Japanese Text-level Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03458 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03458/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05100/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10509/) (2022)
- [Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03493/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Prompting for Zero-Shot Knowledge Graph Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04136/) (2023)
- [Rationale-Augmented Ensembles in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00747/) (2022)
- [Knowledge-Driven CoT: Exploring Faithful Reasoning in LLMs for Knowledge-intensive Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13259/) (2023)
- [Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07914/) (2023)
- [Boosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06427/) (2023)
- [Graph Neural Prompting with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15427/) (2023)
- [Bring Your Own KG: Self-Supervised Program Synthesis for Zero-Shot KGQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07850/) (2023)
- [GIELLM: Japanese General Information Extraction Large Language Model Utilizing Mutual Reinforcement Effect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06838/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Multilingual Dataset and Empirical Validation for the Mutual Reinforcement Effect in Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10953/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred extensive research into LLM-related Prompt investigations, such as Instruction Learning (IL), In-context Learning (ICL), and Chain-of-Thought (CoT). These approaches aim to improve LLMs' responses by enabling them to provide concise statements or examples for deeper contemplation when addressing questions. However, independent thinking by LLMs can introduce variability in their thought processes, leading to potential inaccuracies. In response, our study seeks to bridge the gap between LLM and human-like thinking processes, recognizing that text comprehension begins with understanding individual words. To tackle this challenge, we have expanded the CoT method to cater to a specific domain. Our approach, known as "Think from Words" (TFW), initiates the comprehension process at the word level and then extends it to encompass the entire text. We also propose "TFW with Extra word-level information" (TFW Extra), augmenting comprehension with additional word-level data. To assess our methods, we employ text classification on six Japanese datasets comprising text-level and word-level elements. Our findings not only validate the effectiveness of TFW but also shed light on the impact of various word-level information types on LLMs' text comprehension, offering insights into their potential to cause misinterpretations and errors in the overall comprehension of the final text.