# Conditional Variational Diffusion Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02246 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02246/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07004/) (2016)
- [Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09672/) (2021)
- [Image Super-Resolution via Iterative Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07636/) (2021)
- [Variational Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.00630/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04747/) (2022)
- [DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07469/) (2017)
- [WaveGrad: Estimating Gradients for Waveform Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.00713/) (2020)
- [Noise2Noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.04189/) (2018)
- [A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05034/) (2018)
- [Hierarchical Integration Diffusion Model for Realistic Image Deblurring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12966/) (2023)
- [On hallucinations in tomographic image reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00646/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Compressive Sensing: Classical Results and Recent Advancements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.01014/) (2019)
- [Generating Unobserved Alternatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01926/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Point Cloud Resampling with Learnable Heat Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14120/) (2024)
- [Single Exposure Quantitative Phase Imaging with a Conventional Microscope using Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04388/) (2024)
- [Diffusion Models to Enhance the Resolution of Microscopy Images: A Tutorial](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16488/) (2024)
- [Diffusion-Based Synthetic Brightfield Microscopy Images for Enhanced Single Cell Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00078/) (2025)
- [SWITi: Quantifying and Reducing Tiling Artifacts with Sliding Window Inner Tiling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.18990/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Inverse problems aim to determine parameters from observations, a crucial task in engineering and science. Lately, generative models, especially diffusion models, have gained popularity in this area for their ability to produce realistic solutions and their good mathematical properties. Despite their success, an important drawback of diffusion models is their sensitivity to the choice of variance schedule, which controls the dynamics of the diffusion process. Fine-tuning this schedule for specific applications is crucial but time-costly and does not guarantee an optimal result. We propose a novel approach for learning the schedule as part of the training process. Our method supports probabilistic conditioning on data, provides high-quality solutions, and is flexible, proving able to adapt to different applications with minimum overhead. This approach is tested in two unrelated inverse problems: super-resolution microscopy and quantitative phase imaging, yielding comparable or superior results to previous methods and fine-tuned diffusion models. We conclude that fine-tuning the schedule by experimentation should be avoided because it can be learned during training in a stable way that yields better results.
