# Regressor-Segmenter Mutual Prompt Learning for Crowd Counting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01711 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01711/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 43 of its 67 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.00751/) (2019)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Visual Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12119/) (2022)
- [Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07919/) (2019)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [How Can We Know What Language Models Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12543/) (2019)
- [Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.04366/) (2021)
- [Variational Information Distillation for Knowledge Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05835/) (2019)
- [CSRNet: Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Understanding the Highly Congested Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10062/) (2018)
- [Visual Prompting via Image Inpainting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00647/) (2022)
- [Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01050/) (2018)
- [Bayesian Loss for Crowd Count Estimation with Point Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03684/) (2019)
- [Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds:A Purely Point-Based Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.12746/) (2021)
- [NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03360/) (2020)
- [Context-Aware Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10452/) (2018)
- [Distribution Matching for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13077/) (2020)
- [Switching Convolutional Neural Network for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.00199/) (2017)
- [An End-to-End Transformer Model for Crowd Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13065/) (2022)
- [Boosting Crowd Counting via Multifaceted Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02636/) (2022)
- [Crowd Counting and Density Estimation by Trellis Encoder-Decoder Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00853/) (2019)
- [Perspective-Guided Convolution Networks for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06966/) (2019)
- [Rethinking Spatial Invariance of Convolutional Networks for Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05253/) (2022)
- [Revisiting Perspective Information for Efficient Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01989/) (2018)
- [Crowd Counting with Deep Structured Scale Integration Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08692/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Toward Visual Grounding: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20206/) (2024)
- [OmniCount: Multi-label Object Counting with Semantic-Geometric Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05435/) (2024)
- [YOLO-Count: Differentiable Object Counting for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00728/) (2025)
- [Video Individual Counting for Moving Drones](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10701/) (2025)
- [SoftHGNN: Soft Hypergraph Neural Networks for General Visual Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15325/) (2025)
- [ZIP: Scalable Crowd Counting via Zero-Inflated Poisson Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19955/) (2025)
- [Text-promptable Object Counting via Quantity Awareness Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06679/) (2025)
- [Semi-Supervised Multi-View Crowd Counting by Ranking Multi-View Fusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.16243/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Look Spatial Reasoning for Dense Surgical Instrument Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11024/) (2026)
- [Bootstrapping MLLM for Weakly-Supervised Class-Agnostic Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12774/) (2026)
- [Consistent-Point: Consistent Pseudo-Points for Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12441/) (2025)
- [Exploring Scale Shift in Crowd Localization under the Context of Domain Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19330/) (2025)
- [Video Individual Counting and Tracking from Moving Drones: A Benchmark and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12500/) (2026)
- [Adversarial Patch Generation for Visual-Infrared Dense Prediction Tasks via Joint Position-Color Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00266/) (2026)
- [ABACUS: Adapting Unified Foundation Model for Bridging Image Count Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23835/) (2026)
- [DCA-MoE: Spatially Adaptive Cross-Layer Fusion and Density-Routed Experts for Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15213/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Crowd counting has achieved significant progress by training regressors to predict instance positions. In heavily crowded scenarios, however, regressors are challenged by uncontrollable annotation variance, which causes density map bias and context information inaccuracy. In this study, we propose mutual prompt learning (mPrompt), which leverages a regressor and a segmenter as guidance for each other, solving bias and inaccuracy caused by annotation variance while distinguishing foreground from background. In specific, mPrompt leverages point annotations to tune the segmenter and predict pseudo head masks in a way of point prompt learning. It then uses the predicted segmentation masks, which serve as spatial constraint, to rectify biased point annotations as context prompt learning. mPrompt defines a way of mutual information maximization from prompt learning, mitigating the impact of annotation variance while improving model accuracy. Experiments show that mPrompt significantly reduces the Mean Average Error (MAE), demonstrating the potential to be general framework for down-stream vision tasks.