# Towards leveraging LLMs for Conditional QA

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01143 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01143/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01282/) (2020)
- [Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00051/) (2017)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07042/) (2018)
- [A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.03011/) (2021)
- [Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07899/) (2021)
- [AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10645/) (2020)
- [IIRC: A Dataset of Incomplete Information Reading Comprehension Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.07127/) (2020)
- [ConditionalQA: A Complex Reading Comprehension Dataset with Conditional Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06884/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Code Prompting Elicits Conditional Reasoning Abilities in Text+Code LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10065/) (2024)
- [Chain of Condition: Construct, Verify and Solve Conditions for Conditional Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05442/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study delves into the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the challenging domain of conditional question-answering. Utilizing the Conditional Question Answering (CQA) dataset and focusing on generative models like T5 and UL2, we assess the performance of LLMs across diverse question types. Our findings reveal that fine-tuned LLMs can surpass the state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in some cases, even without fully encoding all input context, with an increase of 7-8 points in Exact Match (EM) and F1 scores for Yes/No questions. However, these models encounter challenges in extractive question answering, where they lag behind the SOTA by over 10 points, and in mitigating the risk of injecting false information. A study with oracle-retrievers emphasizes the critical role of effective evidence retrieval, underscoring the necessity for advanced solutions in this area. Furthermore, we highlight the significant influence of evaluation metrics on performance assessments and advocate for a more comprehensive evaluation framework. The complexity of the task, the observed performance discrepancies, and the need for effective evidence retrieval underline the ongoing challenges in this field and underscore the need for future work focusing on refining training tasks and exploring prompt-based techniques to enhance LLM performance in conditional question-answering tasks.