# Two Scalable Approaches for Burned-Area Mapping Using U-Net and Landsat Imagery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17368 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17368/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04621/) (2017)
- [Aerial Imagery Pile burn detection using Deep Learning: the FLAME dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14036/) (2020)
- [Characterization of Industrial Smoke Plumes from Remote Sensing Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11344/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Monitoring wildfires is an essential step in minimizing their impact on the planet, understanding the many negative environmental, economic, and social consequences. Recent advances in remote sensing technology combined with the increasing application of artificial intelligence methods have improved real-time, high-resolution fire monitoring. This study explores two proposed approaches based on the U-Net model for automating and optimizing the burned-area mapping process. Denoted 128 and AllSizes (AS), they are trained on datasets with a different class balance by cropping input images to different sizes. They are then applied to Landsat imagery and time-series data from two fire-prone regions in Chile. The results obtained after enhancement of model performance by hyperparameter optimization demonstrate the effectiveness of both approaches. Tests based on 195 representative images of the study area show that increasing dataset balance using the AS model yields better performance. More specifically, AS exhibited a Dice Coefficient (DC) of 0.93, an Omission Error (OE) of 0.086, and a Commission Error (CE) of 0.045, while the 128 model achieved a DC of 0.86, an OE of 0.12, and a CE of 0.12. These findings should provide a basis for further development of scalable automatic burned-area mapping tools.