# Does Explainable AI Have Moral Value?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14687 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14687/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Knowledge Distillation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05525/) (2020)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [The Mythos of Model Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03490/) (2016)
- [Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14779/) (2020)
- [Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05239/) (2018)
- [Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02478/) (2020)
- [Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06278/) (2020)
- [Explainable Machine Learning in Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06342/) (2019)
- [Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06823/) (2022)
- [In Search of Verifiability: Explanations Rarely Enable Complementary Performance in AI-Advised Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07722/) (2023)
- [Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10847/) (2022)
- [Enslaving the Algorithm: From a "Right to an Explanation" to a "Right to Better Decisions"?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.07540/) (2018)
- [Explainability in AI Policies: A Critical Review of Communications, Reports, Regulations, and Standards in the EU, US, and UK](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11218/) (2023)
- [Think About the Stakeholders First! Towards an Algorithmic Transparency Playbook for Regulatory Compliance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01482/) (2022)
- [Copying Machine Learning Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.01879/) (2019)
- [Desiderata for Explainable AI in statistical production systems of the European Central Bank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08045/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable AI (XAI) aims to bridge the gap between complex algorithmic systems and human stakeholders. Current discourse often examines XAI in isolation as either a technological tool, user interface, or policy mechanism. This paper proposes a unifying ethical framework grounded in moral duties and the concept of reciprocity. We argue that XAI should be appreciated not merely as a right, but as part of our moral duties that helps sustain a reciprocal relationship between humans affected by AI systems. This is because, we argue, explanations help sustain constitutive symmetry and agency in AI-led decision-making processes. We then assess leading XAI communities and reveal gaps between the ideal of reciprocity and practical feasibility. Machine learning offers useful techniques but overlooks evaluation and adoption challenges. Human-computer interaction provides preliminary insights but oversimplifies organizational contexts. Policies espouse accountability but lack technical nuance. Synthesizing these views exposes barriers to implementable, ethical XAI. Still, positioning XAI as a moral duty transcends rights-based discourse to capture a more robust and complete moral picture. This paper provides an accessible, detailed analysis elucidating the moral value of explainability.