# MRGazer: Decoding Eye Gaze Points from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Individual Space

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13372 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13372/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Eye Tracking for Everyone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05814/) (2016)
- [It's Written All Over Your Face: Full-Face Appearance-Based Gaze Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.08860/) (2016)
- [MPIIGaze: Real-World Dataset and Deep Appearance-Based Gaze Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09017/) (2017)
- [Multi-Class 3D Object Detection Within Volumetric 3D Computed Tomography Baggage Security Screening Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01218/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Eye-tracking research has proven valuable in understanding numerous cognitive functions. Recently, Frey et al. provided an exciting deep learning method for learning eye movements from fMRI data. However, it needed to co-register fMRI into standard space to obtain eyeballs masks, and thus required additional templates and was time consuming. To resolve this issue, in this paper, we propose a framework named MRGazer for predicting eye gaze points from fMRI in individual space. The MRGazer consisted of eyeballs extraction module and a residual network-based eye gaze prediction. Compared to the previous method, the proposed framework skips the fMRI co-registration step, simplifies the processing protocol and achieves end-to-end eye gaze regression. The proposed method achieved superior performance in a variety of eye movement tasks than the co-registration-based method, and delivered objective results within a shorter time (~ 0.02 Seconds for each volume) than prior method (~0.3 Seconds for each volume).