# Beyond Turing: A Comparative Analysis of Approaches for Detecting Machine-Generated Text

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12373 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12373/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11305/) (2023)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.10464/) (2018)
- [DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05540/) (2023)
- [Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.01314/) (2020)
- [MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14822/) (2023)
- [Language Models are Few-shot Multilingual Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07684/) (2021)
- [OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11729/) (2023)
- [Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18149/) (2023)
- [LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15004/) (2023)
- [ArguGPT: evaluating, understanding and identifying argumentative essays generated by GPT models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07666/) (2023)
- [The Effect of Different Writing Tasks on Linguistic Style: A Case Study of the ROC Story Cloze Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.01841/) (2017)
- [Joint Unsupervised and Supervised Training for Multilingual ASR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08137/) (2021)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01284/) (2023)
- [Towards a Robust Detection of Language Model Generated Text: Is ChatGPT that Easy to Detect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05871/) (2023)
- [Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16617/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [From Interpretability to Control: Insights from Six Years of the TrustNLP Workshop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11171/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Significant progress has been made on text generation by pre-trained language models (PLMs), yet distinguishing between human and machine-generated text poses an escalating challenge. This paper offers an in-depth evaluation of three distinct methods used to address this task: traditional shallow learning, Language Model (LM) fine-tuning, and Multilingual Model fine-tuning. These approaches are rigorously tested on a wide range of machine-generated texts, providing a benchmark of their competence in distinguishing between human-authored and machine-authored linguistic constructs. The results reveal considerable differences in performance across methods, thus emphasizing the continued need for advancement in this crucial area of NLP. This study offers valuable insights and paves the way for future research aimed at creating robust and highly discriminative models.