# InfiMM-Eval: Complex Open-Ended Reasoning Evaluation For Multi-Modal Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11567 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11567/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 82 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10592/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03378/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16125/) (2023)
- [A Survey on In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00234/) (2022)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10403/) (2022)
- [OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01390/) (2023)
- [OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16527/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- [SVIT: Scaling up Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04087/) (2023)
- [Text-to-Audio Generation using Instruction-Tuned LLM and Latent Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13731/) (2023)
- [Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14725/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11691/) (2024)
- [SPHINX-X: Scaling Data and Parameters for a Family of Multi-modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05935/) (2024)
- [VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15279/) (2025)
- [MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15296/) (2024)
- [MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01509/) (2024)
- [Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14544/) (2024)
- [The Curious Case of Nonverbal Abstract Reasoning with Multi-Modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12117/) (2024)
- [InfiMM-HD: A Leap Forward in High-Resolution Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01487/) (2024)
- [Visual Anchors Are Strong Information Aggregators For Multimodal Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17815/) (2024)
- [Pearl: A Multimodal Culturally-Aware Arabic Instruction Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21979/) (2025)
- [COCO is "ALL'' You Need for Visual Instruction Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08968/) (2024)
- [The Future of Intelligent Healthcare: A Systematic Analysis and Discussion on the Integration and Impact of Robots Using Large Language Models for Healthcare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03287/) (2024)
- [Children's Intelligence Tests Pose Challenges for MLLMs? KidGym: A 2D Grid-Based Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20209/) (2026)
- [AEGIS: Exploring the Limit of World Knowledge Capabilities for Unified Mulitmodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.00561/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly prominent in the field of artificial intelligence. These models not only excel in traditional vision-language tasks but also demonstrate impressive performance in contemporary multi-modal benchmarks. Although many of these benchmarks attempt to holistically evaluate MLLMs, they typically concentrate on basic reasoning tasks, often yielding only simple yes/no or multi-choice responses. These methods naturally lead to confusion and difficulties in conclusively determining the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. To mitigate this issue, we manually curate a benchmark dataset specifically designed for MLLMs, with a focus on complex reasoning tasks. Our benchmark comprises three key reasoning categories: deductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning. The queries in our dataset are intentionally constructed to engage the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs in the process of generating answers. For a fair comparison across various MLLMs, we incorporate intermediate reasoning steps into our evaluation criteria. In instances where an MLLM is unable to produce a definitive answer, its reasoning ability is evaluated by requesting intermediate reasoning steps. If these steps align with our manual annotations, appropriate scores are assigned. This evaluation scheme resembles methods commonly used in human assessments, such as exams or assignments, and represents what we consider a more effective assessment technique compared with existing benchmarks. We evaluate a selection of representative MLLMs using this rigorously developed open-ended multi-step elaborate reasoning benchmark, designed to challenge and accurately measure their reasoning capabilities. The code and data will be released at https://infimm.github.io/InfiMM-Eval/