# When a Language Question Is at Stake. A Revisited Approach to Label Sensitive Content

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10514 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10514/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04252/) (2019)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02983/) (2019)
- [Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04717/) (2019)
- [Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.09666/) (2019)
- [Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09899/) (2017)
- [Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.08118/) (2017)
- [WECHSEL: Effective initialization of subword embeddings for cross-lingual transfer of monolingual language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06598/) (2021)
- [Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danish](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04531/) (2019)
- [Challenges and Opportunities in Information Manipulation Detection: An Examination of Wartime Russian Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12382/) (2022)
- [Enriching Abusive Language Detection with Community Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08445/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many under-resourced languages require high-quality datasets for specific tasks such as offensive language detection, disinformation, or misinformation identification. However, the intricacies of the content may have a detrimental effect on the annotators. The article aims to revisit an approach of pseudo-labeling sensitive data on the example of Ukrainian tweets covering the Russian-Ukrainian war. Nowadays, this acute topic is in the spotlight of various language manipulations that cause numerous disinformation and profanity on social media platforms. The conducted experiment highlights three main stages of data annotation and underlines the main obstacles during machine annotation. Ultimately, we provide a fundamental statistical analysis of the obtained data, evaluation of models used for pseudo-labelling, and set further guidelines on how the scientists can leverage the corpus to execute more advanced research and extend the existing data samples without annotators' engagement.
