# Learning Fair Division from Bandit Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09068 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09068/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1407.4443/) (2014)
- [Online Fair Division: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.09488/) (2019)
- [Sequential Fair Allocation: Achieving the Optimal Envy-Efficiency Tradeoff Curve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05308/) (2021)
- [Regret Lower Bound and Optimal Algorithm in Finite Stochastic Partial Monitoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.09011/) (2015)
- [Online Market Equilibrium with Application to Fair Division](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12936/) (2021)
- [Nonstationary Dual Averaging and Online Fair Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11614/) (2022)
- [Computing large market equilibria using abstractions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.06230/) (2019)
- [Efficiency and Sequenceability in Fair Division of Indivisible Goods with Additive Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01734/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Honor Among Bandits: No-Regret Learning for Online Fair Division](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01795/) (2024)
- [Online Fair Division with Additional Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24503/) (2025)
- [Keep Everyone Happy: Online Fair Division of Numerous Items with Few Copies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12845/) (2024)
- [Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Division](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03253/) (2025)
- [Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14784/) (2024)
- [Improved Regret Bounds for Online Fair Division with Bandit Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07022/) (2025)
- [Online Fair Division for Personalized 2-Value Instances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22174/) (2025)
- [Envy-Free Allocation of Indivisible Goods via Noisy Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06361/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This work addresses learning online fair division under uncertainty, where a central planner sequentially allocates items without precise knowledge of agents' values or utilities. Departing from conventional online algorithm, the planner here relies on noisy, estimated values obtained after allocating items. We introduce wrapper algorithms utilizing textitdual averaging, enabling gradual learning of both the type distribution of arriving items and agents' values through bandit feedback. This approach enables the algorithms to asymptotically achieve optimal Nash social welfare in linear Fisher markets with agents having additive utilities. We establish regret bounds in Nash social welfare and empirically validate the superior performance of our proposed algorithms across synthetic and empirical datasets.
