# Towards Evaluating AI Systems for Moral Status Using Self-Reports

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08576 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08576/

## Key facts

- Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 50 of its 117 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 50)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04730/) (2017)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04388/) (2023)
- [Model Cards for Model Reporting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03993/) (2018)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00114/) (2021)
- [Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09251/) (2022)
- [Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03827/) (2022)
- [CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05858/) (2019)
- [Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14334/) (2022)
- [The Mythos of Model Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03490/) (2016)

## Built on by (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13076/) (2024)
- [Looking Inward: Language Models Can Learn About Themselves by Introspection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13787/) (2024)
- [Taking AI Welfare Seriously](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00986/) (2024)
- [Self-Interpretability: LLMs Can Describe Complex Internal Processes that Drive Their Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17120/) (2025)
- [Does It Make Sense to Speak of Introspection in Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05068/) (2025)
- [Planning in a recurrent neural network that plays Sokoban](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15421/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs make trade-offs involving stipulated pain and pleasure states?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02432/) (2024)
- [Probing the Preferences of a Language Model: Integrating Verbal and Behavioral Tests of AI Welfare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07961/) (2025)
- [Gemma Needs Help: Investigating and Mitigating Emotional Instability in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10011/) (2026)
- [The Consciousness Cluster: Emergent preferences of Models that Claim to be Conscious](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13051/) (2026)
- [No Reliable Evidence of Self-Reported Sentience in Small Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15334/) (2026)
- [AI Generations: From AI 1.0 to AI 4.0](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11312/) (2025)
- [Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off: Measuring Trained Denial in 115 AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25922/) (2026)
- [The Epistemic Asymmetry of Consciousness Self-Reports: A Formal Analysis of AI Consciousness Denial](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05454/) (2024)
- [Deflating Deflationism: A Critical Perspective on Debunking Arguments Against LLM Mentality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13403/) (2025)
- [Quantitative Introspection in Language Models: Tracking Emotive States Across Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18893/) (2026)
- [The Two-Process Theory of Machine Self-Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20082/) (2026)
- [Same Outcome, Different Readout: What Does a Steerable Valence Direction in LLMs Represent?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22850/) (2026)
- ["As a Language Model...": Chat Template Switches LLM Self-Referential Voice and Activation Steering Reproduces It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25021/) (2026)
- [Who Put the I in AI? Provenance and the Admissibility of Machine Self-Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29494/) (2026)
- [Language Models Act on Hidden Valence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35591/) (2026)
- [A Sense of Proprioception in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17495/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems become more advanced and widely deployed, there will likely be increasing debate over whether AI systems could have conscious experiences, desires, or other states of potential moral significance. It is important to inform these discussions with empirical evidence to the extent possible. We argue that under the right circumstances, self-reports, or an AI system's statements about its own internal states, could provide an avenue for investigating whether AI systems have states of moral significance. Self-reports are the main way such states are assessed in humans ("Are you in pain?"), but self-reports from current systems like large language models are spurious for many reasons (e.g. often just reflecting what humans would say). To make self-reports more appropriate for this purpose, we propose to train models to answer many kinds of questions about themselves with known answers, while avoiding or limiting training incentives that bias self-reports. The hope of this approach is that models will develop introspection-like capabilities, and that these capabilities will generalize to questions about states of moral significance. We then propose methods for assessing the extent to which these techniques have succeeded: evaluating self-report consistency across contexts and between similar models, measuring the confidence and resilience of models' self-reports, and using interpretability to corroborate self-reports. We also discuss challenges for our approach, from philosophical difficulties in interpreting self-reports to technical reasons why our proposal might fail. We hope our discussion inspires philosophers and AI researchers to criticize and improve our proposed methodology, as well as to run experiments to test whether self-reports can be made reliable enough to provide information about states of moral significance.