# LLMs cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them given the error location

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08516 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08516/

## Key facts

- Cited by 85 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10397/) (2022)
- [Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05802/) (2022)
- [Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17491/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09561/) (2022)
- [Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00053/) (2022)
- [Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03188/) (2023)
- [REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01904/) (2023)
- [Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00633/) (2023)
- [SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00436/) (2023)
- [Graph-based, Self-Supervised Program Repair from Diagnostic Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10636/) (2020)
- [Think about it! Improving defeasible reasoning by first modeling the question scenario](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.12349/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 85)

- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12917/) (2024)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01297/) (2024)
- [From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16838/) (2024)
- [BIG-Bench Extra Hard](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19187/) (2025)
- [Pride and Prejudice: LLM Amplifies Self-Bias in Self-Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11436/) (2024)
- [Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06233/) (2025)
- [Agent-R: Training Language Model Agents to Reflect via Iterative Self-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11425/) (2025)
- [Formal Mathematical Reasoning: A New Frontier in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16075/) (2024)
- [LLM Reasoners: New Evaluation, Library, and Analysis of Step-by-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05221/) (2024)
- [Self-rewarding correction for mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19613/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Beyond Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05692/) (2024)
- [TICKing All the Boxes: Generated Checklists Improve LLM Evaluation and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03608/) (2024)
- [The Benefits of a Concise Chain of Thought on Problem-Solving in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05618/) (2024)
- [Judge Decoding: Faster Speculative Sampling Requires Going Beyond Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19309/) (2025)
- [Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03602/) (2024)
- [Sample, Scrutinize and Scale: Effective Inference-Time Search by Scaling Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01839/) (2025)
- [Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12563/) (2024)
- [Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11291/) (2024)
- [A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18634/) (2024)
- [Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19361/) (2025)
- [Can Language Models Perform Robust Reasoning in Chain-of-thought Prompting with Noisy Rationales?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23856/) (2024)
- [Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06682/) (2024)
- [S2R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12853/) (2025)
- [Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02101/) (2024)
- [Weak-to-Strong Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13647/) (2024)
- [Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11199/) (2024)
- [Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models: In-Depth Analysis on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11793/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While self-correction has shown promise in improving LLM outputs in terms of style and quality (e.g. Chen et al., 2023b; Madaan et al., 2023), recent attempts to self-correct logical or reasoning errors often cause correct answers to become incorrect, resulting in worse performances overall (Huang et al., 2023). In this paper, we show that poor self-correction performance stems from LLMs' inability to find logical mistakes, rather than their ability to correct a known mistake. Firstly, we benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs on their mistake-finding ability and demonstrate that they generally struggle with the task, even in highly objective, unambiguous cases. Secondly, we test the correction abilities of LLMs -- separately from mistake finding -- using a backtracking setup that feeds ground truth mistake location information to the model. We show that this boosts downstream task performance across our 5 reasoning tasks, indicating that LLMs' correction abilities are robust. Finally, we show that it is possible to obtain mistake location information without ground truth labels or in-domain training data. We train a small classifier with out-of-domain data, which exhibits stronger mistake-finding performance than prompting a large model. We release our dataset of LLM-generated logical mistakes, BIG-Bench Mistake, to enable further research into locating LLM reasoning mistakes.