# Eval-GCSC: A New Metric for Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Chinese Spelling Correction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08219 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08219/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09813/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01746/) (2023)
- [Spelling Error Correction with Soft-Masked BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07421/) (2020)
- [ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13648/) (2023)
- [SpellGCN: Incorporating Phonological and Visual Similarities into Language Models for Chinese Spelling Check](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14166/) (2020)
- [On the (In)Effectiveness of Large Language Models for Chinese Text Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09007/) (2023)
- [Read, Listen, and See: Leveraging Multimodal Information Helps Chinese Spell Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12306/) (2021)
- [CSCD-NS: a Chinese Spelling Check Dataset for Native Speakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08788/) (2022)
- [Chinese Lexical Analysis with Deep Bi-GRU-CRF Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01882/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

ChatGPT has demonstrated impressive performance in various downstream tasks. However, in the Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) task, we observe a discrepancy: while ChatGPT performs well under human evaluation, it scores poorly according to traditional metrics. We believe this inconsistency arises because the traditional metrics are not well-suited for evaluating generative models. Their overly strict length and phonics constraints may lead to underestimating ChatGPT's correction capabilities. To better evaluate generative models in the CSC task, this paper proposes a new evaluation metric: Eval-GCSC. By incorporating word-level and semantic similarity judgments, it relaxes the stringent length and phonics constraints. Experimental results show that Eval-GCSC closely aligns with human evaluations. Under this metric, ChatGPT's performance is comparable to traditional token-level classification models (TCM), demonstrating its potential as a CSC tool. The source code and scripts can be accessed at https://github.com/ktlKTL/Eval-GCSC.