# Explainable History Distillation by Marked Temporal Point Process

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07797 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07797/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 60 of its 101 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 60)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.3432/) (2013)
- [The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.00712/) (2016)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infilling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10360/) (2021)
- [GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02414/) (2022)
- [Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09838/) (2020)
- [Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07697/) (2019)
- [Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06514/) (2018)
- [Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15679/) (2021)
- [Exact Combinatorial Optimization with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01629/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04315/) (2020)
- [Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07623/) (2018)
- [Transformer Hawkes Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09291/) (2020)
- [Learning to Perform Local Rewriting for Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00337/) (2018)
- [Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10596/) (2020)
- [Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12127/) (2019)
- [Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09615/) (2019)
- [Acquisition of Chess Knowledge in AlphaZero](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09259/) (2021)
- [Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.09690/) (2019)
- [Neural Variational Inference for Text Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06038/) (2015)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Integer Programming: Learning to Cut](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04859/) (2019)
- [Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.00044/) (2021)
- [SEISMIC: A Self-Exciting Point Process Model for Predicting Tweet Popularity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02594/) (2015)
- [Learning Granger Causality for Hawkes Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04511/) (2016)
- [Exploratory Not Explanatory: Counterfactual Analysis of Saliency Maps for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05743/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10539/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Explainability of machine learning models is mandatory when researchers introduce these commonly believed black boxes to real-world tasks, especially high-stakes ones. In this paper, we build a machine learning system to automatically generate explanations of happened events from history by glsca based on the acrfulltpp. Specifically, we propose a new task called acrfullehd. This task requires a model to distill as few events as possible from observed history. The target is that the event distribution conditioned on left events predicts the observed future noticeably worse. We then regard distilled events as the explanation for the future. To efficiently solve acrshortehd, we rewrite the task into a gls01ip and directly estimate the solution to the program by a model called acrfullmodel. This work fills the gap between our task and existing works, which only spot the difference between factual and counterfactual worlds after applying a predefined modification to the environment. Experiment results on Retweet and StackOverflow datasets prove that acrshortmodel significantly outperforms other acrshortehd baselines and can reveal the rationale underpinning real-world processes.
