# Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07759 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07759/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 14 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.05698/) (2015)
- [How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09009/) (2023)
- [A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.10912/) (2019)
- [Semi-supervised sequence tagging with bidirectional language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00108/) (2017)
- [ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04655/) (2023)
- [The More You Know: Using Knowledge Graphs for Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.04844/) (2016)
- [BERT is to NLP what AlexNet is to CV: Can Pre-Trained Language Models Identify Analogies?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04949/) (2021)
- [ProtoQA: A Question Answering Dataset for Prototypical Common-Sense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00771/) (2020)
- [Attention-based Conditioning Methods for External Knowledge Integration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03674/) (2019)
- [The Elephant in the Room](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.03305/) (2018)
- [On the Capabilities of Pointer Networks for Deep Deductive Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09225/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09176/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Graphs of Driving Scenes to Empower the Emerging Capabilities of Neurosymbolic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03225/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

High-level reasoning can be defined as the capability to generalize over knowledge acquired via experience, and to exhibit robust behavior in novel situations. Such form of reasoning is a basic skill in humans, who seamlessly use it in a broad spectrum of tasks, from language communication to decision making in complex situations. When it manifests itself in understanding and manipulating the everyday world of objects and their interactions, we talk about common sense or commonsense reasoning. State-of-the-art AI systems don't possess such capability: for instance, Large Language Models have recently become popular by demonstrating remarkable fluency in conversing with humans, but they still make trivial mistakes when probed for commonsense competence; on a different level, performance degradation outside training data prevents self-driving vehicles to safely adapt to unseen scenarios, a serious and unsolved problem that limits the adoption of such technology. In this paper we propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
