# Trusted Source Alignment in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06697 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06697/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Language Models as Knowledge Bases?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01066/) (2019)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08239/) (2022)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00661/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03409/) (2023)
- [Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09251/) (2022)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14974/) (2020)
- ["Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00648/) (2017)
- [MultiFC: A Real-World Multi-Domain Dataset for Evidence-Based Fact Checking of Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03242/) (2019)
- [Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10168/) (2023)
- [Truthful AI: Developing and governing AI that does not lie](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06674/) (2021)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08412/) (2022)
- [X-FACT: A New Benchmark Dataset for Multilingual Fact Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09248/) (2021)
- [Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02443/) (2020)
- [BoardgameQA: A Dataset for Natural Language Reasoning with Contradictory Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07934/) (2023)
- [Facts as Experts: Adaptable and Interpretable Neural Memory over Symbolic Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00849/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [How Susceptible are LLMs to Influence in Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11865/) (2024)
- [The Future of Large Language Model Pre-training is Federated](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10853/) (2024)
- [Resolving Conflicting Evidence in Automated Fact-Checking: A Study on Retrieval-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17762/) (2025)
- [Dynamic Normativity: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Value Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11039/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are trained on web-scale corpora that inevitably include contradictory factual information from sources of varying reliability. In this paper, we propose measuring an LLM property called trusted source alignment (TSA): the model's propensity to align with content produced by trusted publishers in the face of uncertainty or controversy. We present FactCheckQA, a TSA evaluation dataset based on a corpus of fact checking articles. We describe a simple protocol for evaluating TSA and offer a detailed analysis of design considerations including response extraction, claim contextualization, and bias in prompt formulation. Applying the protocol to PaLM-2, we find that as we scale up the model size, the model performance on FactCheckQA improves from near-random to up to 80% balanced accuracy in aligning with trusted sources.
