# Federated Learning Across Decentralized and Unshared Archives for Remote Sensing Image Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06141 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06141/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [HyperNetworks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.09106/) (2016)
- [Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06335/) (2019)
- [Model-Contrastive Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.16257/) (2021)
- [Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07242/) (2020)
- [FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07623/) (2021)
- [Federated Learning with Matched Averaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06440/) (2020)
- [Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04263/) (2021)
- [Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.10056/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Federated Learning Systems: Vision, Hype and Reality for Data Privacy and Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09693/) (2019)
- [FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11751/) (2022)
- [FedBE: Making Bayesian Model Ensemble Applicable to Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01974/) (2020)
- [Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06337/) (2020)
- [Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14213/) (2021)
- [Layer-wised Model Aggregation for Personalized Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.03993/) (2022)
- [BigEarthNet-MM: A Large Scale Multi-Modal Multi-Label Benchmark Archive for Remote Sensing Image Classification and Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07921/) (2021)
- [Papaya: Practical, Private, and Scalable Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04877/) (2021)
- [FedAUX: Leveraging Unlabeled Auxiliary Data in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02514/) (2021)
- [Tackling System and Statistical Heterogeneity for Federated Learning with Adaptive Client Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11256/) (2021)
- [LightSecAgg: a Lightweight and Versatile Design for Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14236/) (2021)
- [Cost-Effective Federated Learning Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08336/) (2020)
- [Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning: Achievements and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10996/) (2021)
- [FedKL: Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Reinforcement Learning by Penalizing KL Divergence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.08125/) (2022)
- [Learning Across Decentralized Multi-Modal Remote Sensing Archives with Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00792/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Transformer-based Federated Learning for Multi-Label Remote Sensing Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15405/) (2024)
- [FedRS-Bench: Realistic Federated Learning Datasets and Benchmarks in Remote Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08325/) (2025)
- [A Multi-Modal Federated Learning Framework for Remote Sensing Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10262/) (2025)
- [FedX: Explanation-Guided Pruning for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning in Remote Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06256/) (2025)
- [Towards Realistic Remote Sensing Dataset Distillation with Discriminative Prototype-guided Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15829/) (2026)
- [Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Based on Explanation-Guided Pruning for Remote Sensing Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11493/) (2025)
- [Leveraging Membership Inference Attacks for Privacy Measurement in Federated Learning for Remote Sensing Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06200/) (2026)
- [FedEU: Evidential Uncertainty-Driven Federated Fine-Tuning of Vision Foundation Models for Remote Sensing Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07468/) (2026)
- [On the Effectiveness of Adaptation Strategies for VLM-Based Federated Learning in Remote Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04791/) (2026)
- [FedMAD: Modulation-Aware Directional Aggregation for Federated Learning in Remote Sensing Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00693/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) enables the collaboration of multiple deep learning models to learn from decentralized data archives (i.e., clients) without accessing data on clients. Although FL offers ample opportunities in knowledge discovery from distributed image archives, it is seldom considered in remote sensing (RS). In this paper, as a first time in RS, we present a comparative study of state-of-the-art FL algorithms for RS image classification problems. To this end, we initially provide a systematic review of the FL algorithms presented in the computer vision and machine learning communities. Then, we select several state-of-the-art FL algorithms based on their effectiveness with respect to training data heterogeneity across clients (known as non-IID data). After presenting an extensive overview of the selected algorithms, a theoretical comparison of the algorithms is conducted based on their: 1) local training complexity; 2) aggregation complexity; 3) learning efficiency; 4) communication cost; and 5) scalability in terms of number of clients. After the theoretical comparison, experimental analyses are presented to compare them under different decentralization scenarios. For the experimental analyses, we focus our attention on multi-label image classification problems in RS. Based on our comprehensive analyses, we finally derive a guideline for selecting suitable FL algorithms in RS. The code of this work is publicly available at https://git.tu-berlin.de/rsim/FL-RS.
