# Multilingual and Multi-topical Benchmark of Fine-tuned Language models and Large Language Models for Check-Worthy Claim Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06121 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06121/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03654/) (2020)
- [Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.10509/) (2019)
- [GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpoints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13245/) (2023)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.05053/) (2018)
- [Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02707/) (2023)
- [Do We Still Need Clinical Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08091/) (2023)
- [Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic: Modeling the Perspective of Journalists, Fact-Checkers, Social Media Platforms, Policy Makers, and the Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00033/) (2020)
- [DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08222/) (2021)
- [Towards Automated Factchecking: Developing an Annotation Schema and Benchmark for Consistent Automated Claim Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08193/) (2018)
- [A Benchmark Dataset of Check-worthy Factual Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14425/) (2020)
- [CheckThat! at CLEF 2020: Enabling the Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08546/) (2020)
- [LESA: Linguistic Encapsulation and Semantic Amalgamation Based Generalised Claim Detection from Online Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11891/) (2021)
- [NewsClaims: A New Benchmark for Claim Detection from News with Attribute Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08544/) (2021)
- [Empowering the Fact-checkers! Automatic Identification of Claim Spans on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04710/) (2022)
- [News Verifiers Showdown: A Comparative Performance Evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Bing AI, and Bard in News Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17176/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Soft Language Prompts for Language Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02317/) (2024)
- [Calibrating Small Language Models for Claim Check-Worthiness Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30731/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study compares the performance of (1) fine-tuned language models and (2) large language models on the task of check-worthy claim detection. For the purpose of the comparison we composed a multilingual and multi-topical dataset comprising texts of various sources and styles. Building on this, we performed a benchmark analysis to determine the most general multilingual and multi-topical claim detector. We chose three state-of-the-art models in the check-worthy claim detection task and fine-tuned them. Furthermore, we selected four state-of-the-art large language models without any fine-tuning. We made modifications to the models to adapt them for multilingual settings and through extensive experimentation and evaluation, we assessed the performance of all the models in terms of accuracy, recall, and F1-score in in-domain and cross-domain scenarios. Our results demonstrate that despite the technological progress in the area of natural language processing, the models fine-tuned for the task of check-worthy claim detection still outperform the zero-shot approaches in cross-domain settings.
