# LitSumm: Large language models for literature summarisation of non-coding RNAs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03056 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03056/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05794/) (2022)
- [Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08491/) (2023)
- [Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12813/) (2023)
- [Effective Long-Context Scaling of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16039/) (2023)
- [Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07321/) (2017)
- [Reliability and Learnability of Human Bandit Feedback for Sequence-to-Sequence Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.10627/) (2018)
- [Generating (Factual?) Narrative Summaries of RCTs: Experiments with Neural Multi-Document Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.11293/) (2020)
- [Summarizing, Simplifying, and Synthesizing Medical Evidence Using GPT-3 (with Varying Success)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06299/) (2023)
- [Visconde: Multi-document QA with GPT-3 and Neural Reranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09656/) (2022)
- [Automated Metrics for Medical Multi-Document Summarization Disagree with Human Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13693/) (2023)
- [Gene Set Summarization using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13338/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Human Feedback to Scale Educational Datasets: Combining Crowdworkers and Comparative Judgement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12894/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Generative Artificial Intelligence in Bioinformatics: A Systematic Review of Models, Applications, and Methodological Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03354/) (2025)
- [An Empirical Analysis of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models on Bioinformatics Literature: PRSGPT and BioStarsGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11573/) (2025)
- [CheckSupport: A Local LLM-Powered Tool for Automated Manuscript Submission Checklist Selection and Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16377/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Curation of literature in life sciences is a growing challenge. The continued increase in the rate of publication, coupled with the relatively fixed number of curators worldwide presents a major challenge to developers of biomedical knowledgebases. Very few knowledgebases have resources to scale to the whole relevant literature and all have to prioritise their efforts. In this work, we take a first step to alleviating the lack of curator time in RNA science by generating summaries of literature for non-coding RNAs using large language models (LLMs). We demonstrate that high-quality, factually accurate summaries with accurate references can be automatically generated from the literature using a commercial LLM and a chain of prompts and checks. Manual assessment was carried out for a subset of summaries, with the majority being rated extremely high quality. We apply our tool to a selection of over 4,600 ncRNAs and make the generated summaries available via the RNAcentral resource. We conclude that automated literature summarization is feasible with the current generation of LLMs, provided careful prompting and automated checking are applied.