# ACQUIRED: A Dataset for Answering Counterfactual Questions In Real-Life Videos

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01620 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01620/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 49 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07871/) (2017)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03654/) (2020)
- [The Kinetics Human Action Video Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.06950/) (2017)
- [Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07058/) (2021)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.08276/) (2021)
- [VideoBERT: A Joint Model for Video and Language Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01766/) (2019)
- [From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10830/) (2018)
- [CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01442/) (2019)
- [Less is More: ClipBERT for Video-and-Language Learning via Sparse Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06183/) (2021)
- [UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00700/) (2020)
- [TVQA: Localized, Compositional Video Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01696/) (2018)
- [TGIF-QA: Toward Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04497/) (2017)
- [HERO: Hierarchical Encoder for Video+Language Omni-representation Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00200/) (2020)
- [A simple neural network module for relational reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.01427/) (2017)
- [YouTube-8M: A Large-Scale Video Classification Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.08675/) (2016)
- [VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06825/) (2021)
- [MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02636/) (2021)
- [MovieQA: Understanding Stories in Movies through Question-Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.02902/) (2015)
- [Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02338/) (2018)
- [ActBERT: Learning Global-Local Video-Text Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.07231/) (2020)
- [VIOLET : End-to-End Video-Language Transformers with Masked Visual-token Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12681/) (2021)
- [MERLOT Reserve: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Sound](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.02639/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [CausalVQA: A Physically Grounded Causal Reasoning Benchmark for Video Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09943/) (2025)
- [Reasoning is All You Need for Video Generalization: A Counterfactual Benchmark with Sub-question Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10691/) (2025)
- [RoboTrustBench: Benchmarking the Trustworthiness of Video World Models for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01600/) (2026)
- [VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23693/) (2025)
- [Looking Beyond Visible Cues: Implicit Video Question Answering via Dual-Clue Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07811/) (2025)
- [Harnessing Synthetic Preference Data for Enhancing Temporal Understanding of Video-LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03955/) (2025)
- [A Skill-augmented Agentic Framework and Benchmark for Multi-Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14733/) (2026)
- [SocialReasonBench: A Video-QA Benchmark for Social Reasoning with Counterfactual Narrative Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30716/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal counterfactual reasoning is a vital yet challenging ability for AI systems. It involves predicting the outcomes of hypothetical circumstances based on vision and language inputs, which enables AI models to learn from failures and explore hypothetical scenarios. Despite its importance, there are only a few datasets targeting the counterfactual reasoning abilities of multimodal models. Among them, they only cover reasoning over synthetic environments or specific types of events (e.g. traffic collisions), making them hard to reliably benchmark the model generalization ability in diverse real-world scenarios and reasoning dimensions. To overcome these limitations, we develop a video question answering dataset, ACQUIRED: it consists of 3.9K annotated videos, encompassing a wide range of event types and incorporating both first and third-person viewpoints, which ensures a focus on real-world diversity. In addition, each video is annotated with questions that span three distinct dimensions of reasoning, including physical, social, and temporal, which can comprehensively evaluate the model counterfactual abilities along multiple aspects. We benchmark our dataset against several state-of-the-art language-only and multimodal models and experimental results demonstrate a significant performance gap (>13%) between models and humans. The findings suggest that multimodal counterfactual reasoning remains an open challenge and ACQUIRED is a comprehensive and reliable benchmark for inspiring future research in this direction.