# Learning From Mistakes Makes LLM Better Reasoner

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20689 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20689/

## Key facts

- Cited by 101 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 49 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Mathematical reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/mathematical-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02235/) (2021)
- [MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12284/) (2023)
- [Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10305/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11610/) (2022)
- [WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09583/) (2023)
- [Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG 530B, A Large-Scale Generative Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11990/) (2022)
- [Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03057/) (2022)
- [Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06476/) (2023)
- [Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01825/) (2023)
- [Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12295/) (2023)
- [Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09712/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10071/) (2022)
- [A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15772/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 101)

- [Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02716/) (2024)
- [Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09567/) (2025)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00157/) (2024)
- [Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05459/) (2024)
- [Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13228/) (2024)
- [V-STaR: Training Verifiers for Self-Taught Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06457/) (2024)
- [Easy-to-Hard Generalization: Scalable Alignment Beyond Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09472/) (2024)
- [The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05761/) (2024)
- [Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17140/) (2024)
- [T1: Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11651/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20046/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models Can Self-Improve Reasoning via Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00855/) (2024)
- [Key-Point-Driven Data Synthesis with its Enhancement on Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02333/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08446/) (2025)
- [Internal Consistency and Self-Feedback in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14507/) (2024)
- [Sample, Scrutinize and Scale: Effective Inference-Time Search by Scaling Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01839/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00755/) (2024)
- [Think Twice Before Trusting: Self-Detection for Large Language Models through Comprehensive Answer Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09972/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Data Synthesis and Augmentation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12896/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02497/) (2025)
- [Weak-to-Strong Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13647/) (2024)
- [The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02875/) (2025)
- [SMoA: Improving Multi-agent Large Language Models with Sparse Mixture-of-Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03284/) (2024)
- [Step Back to Leap Forward: Self-Backtracking for Boosting Reasoning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04404/) (2025)
- [Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18248/) (2024)
- [Skywork-Math: Data Scaling Laws for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models -- The Story Goes On](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08348/) (2024)
- [How Numerical Precision Affects Arithmetical Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13857/) (2024)
- [Temporal Knowledge Question Answering via Abstract Reasoning Induction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09149/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Solve longer Math Word Problems Better?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14804/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) recently exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities on solving math problems. To further improve their reasoning capabilities, this work explores whether LLMs can LEarn from MistAkes (LEMA), akin to the human learning process. Consider a human student who failed to solve a math problem, he will learn from what mistake he has made and how to correct it. Mimicking this error-driven learning process, LEMA incorporates mistake-correction data pairs during fine-tuning LLMs. Specifically, we first collect inaccurate reasoning paths from various LLMs, and then employ GPT-4 as a ''corrector'' to identify the mistake step, explain the reason for the mistake, correct the mistake and generate the final answer. In addition, we apply a correction-centric evolution strategy that effectively expands the question set for generating correction data. Experiments across various LLMs and reasoning tasks show that LEMA effectively improves CoT-alone fine-tuning. Our further ablations shed light on the non-homogeneous effectiveness between CoT data and correction data. These results suggest a significant potential for LLMs to improve through learning from their mistakes. Our code, models and prompts are publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/LEMA.