# Erato: Automatizing Poetry Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20326 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20326/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 3 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Human Evaluation of Creative NLG Systems: An Interdisciplinary Survey on Recent Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00308/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present Erato, a framework designed to facilitate the automated evaluation of poetry, including that generated by poetry generation systems. Our framework employs a diverse set of features, and we offer a brief overview of Erato's capabilities and its potential for expansion. Using Erato, we compare and contrast human-authored poetry with automatically-generated poetry, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying key differences. Our implementation code and software are freely available under the GNU GPLv3 license.