# TarGEN: Targeted Data Generation with Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17876 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17876/

## Key facts

- Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 49 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [When Does Label Smoothing Help?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02629/) (2019)
- [Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07705/) (2022)
- [Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08773/) (2021)
- [Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.09301/) (2018)
- [WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09121/) (2018)
- [Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03047/) (2023)
- [Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06280/) (2022)
- [Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08420/) (2021)
- [Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15895/) (2023)
- [ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07922/) (2022)
- [WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05955/) (2022)
- [ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12885/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [AI-Assisted Generation of Difficult Math Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21009/) (2024)
- [MURI: High-Quality Instruction Tuning Datasets for Low-Resource Languages via Reverse Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12958/) (2024)
- [LLM for Barcodes: Generating Diverse Synthetic Data for Identity Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14962/) (2024)
- [Triplets Better Than Pairs: Towards Stable and Effective Self-Play Fine-Tuning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08198/) (2026)
- [Reducing LLM Hallucinations using Epistemic Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15576/) (2023)
- [Fictitious Synthetic Data Can Improve LLM Factuality via Prerequisite Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19290/) (2024)
- [Survey and Experiments on Mental Disorder Detection via Social Media: From Large Language Models and RAG to Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02800/) (2025)
- [GuidedSampling: Steering LLMs Towards Diverse Candidate Solutions at Inference-Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03777/) (2025)
- [Reasoning-Driven Synthetic Data Generation and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29791/) (2026)
- [Filtering with Confidence: When Data Augmentation Meets Conformal Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21479/) (2025)
- [Learning from Reasoning Failures via Synthetic Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14523/) (2025)
- [AI-enhanced semantic feature norms for 786 concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10718/) (2025)
- [What Matters in LLM-generated Data: Diversity and Its Effect on Model Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19262/) (2025)
- [Mid-Training with Self-Generated Data Improves Reinforcement Learning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08472/) (2026)
- [Efficacy of Machine-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14423/) (2023)
- [Towards a Unified Multimodal Reasoning Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15021/) (2023)
- [Evolving and Detecting Multi-Turn Deception using Geometric Signatures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27671/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has sparked interest in data synthesis techniques, aiming to generate diverse and high-quality synthetic datasets. However, these synthetic datasets often suffer from a lack of diversity and added noise. In this paper, we present TarGEN, a multi-step prompting strategy for generating high-quality synthetic datasets utilizing a LLM. An advantage of TarGEN is its seedless nature; it does not require specific task instances, broadening its applicability beyond task replication. We augment TarGEN with a method known as self-correction empowering LLMs to rectify inaccurately labeled instances during dataset creation, ensuring reliable labels. To assess our technique's effectiveness, we emulate 8 tasks from the SuperGLUE benchmark and finetune various language models, including encoder-only, encoder-decoder, and decoder-only models on both synthetic and original training sets. Evaluation on the original test set reveals that models trained on datasets generated by TarGEN perform approximately 1-2% points better than those trained on original datasets (82.84% via syn. vs. 81.12% on og. using Flan-T5). When incorporating instruction tuning, the performance increases to 84.54% on synthetic data vs. 81.49% on original data by Flan-T5. A comprehensive analysis of the synthetic dataset compared to the original dataset reveals that the synthetic dataset demonstrates similar or higher levels of dataset complexity and diversity. Furthermore, the synthetic dataset displays a bias level that aligns closely with the original dataset. Finally, when pre-finetuned on our synthetic SuperGLUE dataset, T5-3B yields impressive results on the OpenLLM leaderboard, surpassing the model trained on the Self-Instruct dataset by 4.14% points. We hope that TarGEN can be helpful for quality data generation and reducing the human efforts to create complex benchmarks.