# Image Segmentation using U-Net Architecture for Powder X-ray Diffraction Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16186 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16186/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03167/) (2015)
- [Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4038/) (2014)
- [3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06650/) (2016)
- [The Importance of Skip Connections in Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04117/) (2016)
- [Fully Dense UNet for 2D Sparse Photoacoustic Tomography Artifact Removal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.10848/) (2018)
- [Artifact Identification in X-ray Diffraction Data using Machine Learning Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14804/) (2022)
- [DLSIA: Deep Learning for Scientific Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02559/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific researchers frequently use the in situ synchrotron high-energy powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique to examine the crystallographic structures of materials in functional devices such as rechargeable battery materials. We propose a method for identifying artifacts in experimental XRD images. The proposed method uses deep learning convolutional neural network architectures, such as tunable U-Nets to identify the artifacts. In particular, the predicted artifacts are evaluated against the corresponding ground truth (manually implemented) using the overall true positive rate or recall. The result demonstrates that the U-Nets can consistently produce great recall performance at 92.4% on the test dataset, which is not included in the training, with a 34% reduction in average false positives in comparison to the conventional method. The U-Nets also reduce the time required to identify and separate artifacts by more than 50%. Furthermore, the exclusion of the artifacts shows major changes in the integrated 1D XRD pattern, enhancing further analysis of the post-processing XRD data.