# Correction with Backtracking Reduces Hallucination in Summarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16176 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16176/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.04368/) (2017)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08777/) (2019)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00661/) (2020)
- [Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.06023/) (2016)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05463/) (2023)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05052/) (2021)
- [Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14739/) (2023)
- [AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16739/) (2023)
- [Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07317/) (2023)
- [Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15852/) (2023)
- [Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01081/) (2019)
- [Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09061/) (2021)
- [Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02443/) (2020)
- [Sticking to the Facts: Confident Decoding for Faithful Data-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08684/) (2019)
- [Faithfulness-Aware Decoding Strategies for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03278/) (2023)
- [Don't Say What You Don't Know: Improving the Consistency of Abstractive Summarization by Constraining Beam Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08436/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Confabulation: The Surprising Value of Large Language Model Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04175/) (2024)
- [Comparing Hallucination Detection Metrics for Multilingual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10496/) (2024)
- [HalluCana: Fixing LLM Hallucination with A Canary Lookahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07965/) (2024)
- [Adaptive Backtracking for Privacy Protection in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06087/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Abstractive summarization aims at generating natural language summaries of a source document that are succinct while preserving the important elements. Despite recent advances, neural text summarization models are known to be susceptible to hallucinating (or more correctly confabulating), that is to produce summaries with details that are not grounded in the source document. In this paper, we introduce a simple yet efficient technique, CoBa, to reduce hallucination in abstractive summarization. The approach is based on two steps: hallucination detection and mitigation. We show that the former can be achieved through measuring simple statistics about conditional word probabilities and distance to context words. Further, we demonstrate that straight-forward backtracking is surprisingly effective at mitigation. We thoroughly evaluate the proposed method with prior art on three benchmark datasets for text summarization. The results show that CoBa is effective and efficient in reducing hallucination, and offers great adaptability and flexibility. Code can be found at https://github.com/zhenzhel/CoBa.