# Interpreting Answers to Yes-No Questions in User-Generated Content

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15464 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15464/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03975/) (2016)
- [CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07042/) (2018)
- [QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06378/) (2021)
- [QuAC : Question Answering in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.07036/) (2018)
- [MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07475/) (2019)
- [Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01247/) (2021)
- [Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08387/) (2021)
- [HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06712/) (2021)
- [The Turking Test: Can Language Models Understand Instructions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11982/) (2020)
- [TWEETQA: A Social Media Focused Question Answering Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06292/) (2019)
- ["I'd rather just go to bed": Understanding Indirect Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03450/) (2020)
- [RikiNet: Reading Wikipedia Pages for Natural Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14560/) (2020)
- [A Context-aware Attention Network for Interactive Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.07411/) (2016)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Interpreting answers to yes-no questions in social media is difficult. Yes and no keywords are uncommon, and the few answers that include them are rarely to be interpreted what the keywords suggest. In this paper, we present a new corpus of 4,442 yes-no question-answer pairs from Twitter. We discuss linguistic characteristics of answers whose interpretation is yes or no, as well as answers whose interpretation is unknown. We show that large language models are far from solving this problem, even after fine-tuning and blending other corpora for the same problem but outside social media.