# XTSC-Bench: Quantitative Benchmarking for Explainers on Time Series Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14957 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14957/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2901/) (2013)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.07269/) (2017)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07896/) (2020)
- [Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07538/) (2018)
- [The UCR Time Series Archive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.07758/) (2018)
- [The UEA multivariate time series classification archive, 2018](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00075/) (2018)
- [Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08485/) (2019)
- [Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00631/) (2020)
- [Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06861/) (2022)
- [One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03012/) (2019)
- [Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07258/) (2020)
- [Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.13924/) (2020)
- [The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.15911/) (2020)
- [CARLA: A Python Library to Benchmark Algorithmic Recourse and Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00783/) (2021)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) on TimeSeries Data: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00950/) (2021)
- [On quantitative aspects of model interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07584/) (2020)
- [Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.07082/) (2019)
- [Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.13211/) (2020)
- [Quantifying Interpretability and Trust in Machine Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08558/) (2019)
- [Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10781/) (2020)
- [TSViz: Demystification of Deep Learning Models for Time-Series Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.02952/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [What-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27792/) (2026)
- [Explanation Space: A New Perspective into Time Series Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01354/) (2024)
- [Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Should be Human-Centered and Temporally Coherent in Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14559/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the growing body of work on explainable machine learning in time series classification (TSC), it remains unclear how to evaluate different explainability methods. Resorting to qualitative assessment and user studies to evaluate explainers for TSC is difficult since humans have difficulties understanding the underlying information contained in time series data. Therefore, a systematic review and quantitative comparison of explanation methods to confirm their correctness becomes crucial. While steps to standardized evaluations were taken for tabular, image, and textual data, benchmarking explainability methods on time series is challenging due to a) traditional metrics not being directly applicable, b) implementation and adaption of traditional metrics for time series in the literature vary, and c) varying baseline implementations. This paper proposes XTSC-Bench, a benchmarking tool providing standardized datasets, models, and metrics for evaluating explanation methods on TSC. We analyze 3 perturbation-, 6 gradient- and 2 example-based explanation methods to TSC showing that improvements in the explainers' robustness and reliability are necessary, especially for multivariate data.