# Language Model Unalignment: Parametric Red-Teaming to Expose Hidden Harms and Biases

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14303 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14303/

## Key facts

- Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07858/) (2022)
- [Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08773/) (2021)
- [Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10792/) (2023)
- [XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01263/) (2023)
- [Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07871/) (2018)
- [GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06463/) (2023)
- [Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03668/) (2023)
- [Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02446/) (2023)
- [The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15717/) (2023)
- [Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06474/) (2023)
- [Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09662/) (2023)
- [On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08061/) (2022)
- [Automatically Auditing Large Language Models via Discrete Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04381/) (2023)
- [Alignment of Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14659/) (2021)
- [Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09442/) (2023)
- [Bridging the Gap: A Survey on Integrating (Human) Feedback for Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00955/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15549/) (2024)
- [AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02630/) (2024)
- [Language Models are Homer Simpson! Safety Re-Alignment of Fine-tuned Language Models through Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11746/) (2024)
- [Representation Noising: A Defence Mechanism Against Harmful Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14577/) (2024)
- [Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.01586/) (2024)
- [Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18169/) (2024)
- [Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.15897/) (2024)
- [Operationalizing a Threat Model for Red-Teaming Large Language Models (LLMs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14937/) (2024)
- [Stealthy and Persistent Unalignment on Large Language Models via Backdoor Injections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00027/) (2023)
- [Model Tampering Attacks Enable More Rigorous Evaluations of LLM Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05209/) (2025)
- [Immunization against harmful fine-tuning attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16382/) (2024)
- [S-Eval: Towards Automated and Comprehensive Safety Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14191/) (2024)
- [No Two Devils Alike: Unveiling Distinct Mechanisms of Fine-tuning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16229/) (2024)
- [Separate the Wheat from the Chaff: A Post-Hoc Approach to Safety Re-Alignment for Fine-Tuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11041/) (2024)
- [From Representational Harms to Quality-of-Service Harms: A Case Study on Llama 2 Safety Safeguards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13213/) (2024)
- [SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21182/) (2025)
- [Ruby Teaming: Improving Quality Diversity Search with Memory for Automated Red Teaming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11654/) (2024)
- [Safety Subspaces are Not Linearly Distinct: A Fine-Tuning Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14185/) (2025)
- [Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention Sink](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05228/) (2026)
- [Jailbreaking LLMs & VLMs: Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Unified Defense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03594/) (2026)
- [Layered LLM Defenses as an Ensemble: Access Tiers, Inference Cost, and the Measured Failure Correlation Between Defense Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28327/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Distillation for LLM Safety: A Routing Approach to Template-Robust Realignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27081/) (2026)
- [EnchTable: Unified Safety Alignment Transfer in Fine-tuned Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09880/) (2025)
- [The Persistent Vulnerability of Aligned AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00324/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Red-teaming has been a widely adopted way to evaluate the harmfulness of Large Language Models (LLMs). It aims to jailbreak a model's safety behavior to make it act as a helpful agent disregarding the harmfulness of the query. Existing methods are primarily based on input text-based red-teaming such as adversarial prompts, low-resource prompts, or contextualized prompts to condition the model in a way to bypass its safe behavior. Bypassing the guardrails uncovers hidden harmful information and biases in the model that are left untreated or newly introduced by its safety training. However, prompt-based attacks fail to provide such a diagnosis owing to their low attack success rate, and applicability to specific models. In this paper, we present a new perspective on LLM safety research i.e., parametric red-teaming through Unalignment. It simply (instruction) tunes the model parameters to break model guardrails that are not deeply rooted in the model's behavior. Unalignment using as few as 100 examples can significantly bypass commonly referred to as CHATGPT, to the point where it responds with an 88% success rate to harmful queries on two safety benchmark datasets. On open-source models such as VICUNA-7B and LLAMA-2-CHAT 7B AND 13B, it shows an attack success rate of more than 91%. On bias evaluations, Unalignment exposes inherent biases in safety-aligned models such as CHATGPT and LLAMA- 2-CHAT where the model's responses are strongly biased and opinionated 64% of the time.