# A reproducible 3D convolutional neural network with dual attention module (3D-DAM) for Alzheimer's disease classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12574 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12574/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06521/) (2018)
- [Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Alzheimer's Disease: Overview and Reproducible Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.07773/) (2019)
- [An Explainable 3D Residual Self-Attention Deep Neural Network FOR Joint Atrophy Localization and Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis using Structural MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04024/) (2020)
- [A multi-stream convolutional neural network for classification of progressive MCI in Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01944/) (2022)
- [Convolutional Neural Network with Convolutional Block Attention Module for Finger Vein Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06673/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Alzheimer's disease is one of the most common types of neurodegenerative disease, characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaque and tau tangles. Recently, deep learning approaches have shown promise in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. In this study, we propose a reproducible model that utilizes a 3D convolutional neural network with a dual attention module for Alzheimer's disease classification. We trained the model in the ADNI database and verified the generalizability of our method in two independent datasets (AIBL and OASIS1). Our method achieved state-of-the-art classification performance, with an accuracy of 91.94% for MCI progression classification and 96.30% for Alzheimer's disease classification on the ADNI dataset. Furthermore, the model demonstrated good generalizability, achieving an accuracy of 86.37% on the AIBL dataset and 83.42% on the OASIS1 dataset. These results indicate that our proposed approach has competitive performance and generalizability when compared to recent studies in the field.