# Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11207 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11207/

## Key facts

- Cited by 90 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2901/) (2013)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00399/) (2017)
- [ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03429/) (2019)
- [e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01193/) (2018)
- [Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragile](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10547/) (2017)
- [Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02508/) (2019)
- [AI safety via debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00899/) (2018)
- [Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14779/) (2020)
- [Is Attention Interpretable?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03731/) (2019)
- [On the Robustness of Interpretability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.08049/) (2018)
- [Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13867/) (2023)
- [Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.04806/) (2017)
- [Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08220/) (2016)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.01066/) (2015)
- [The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01602/) (2022)
- [Debugging Tests for Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.05429/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of ChatGPT for Query or Aspect-based Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08081/) (2023)
- [Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14403/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 90)

- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07510/) (2024)
- [Are self-explanations from Large Language Models faithful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07927/) (2024)
- [On Measuring Faithfulness or Self-consistency of Natural Language Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07466/) (2023)
- [TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04133/) (2025)
- [Determinants of LLM-assisted Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17385/) (2024)
- [Usable XAI: 10 Strategies Towards Exploiting Explainability in the LLM Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08946/) (2024)
- [LC-LLM: Explainable Lane-Change Intention and Trajectory Predictions with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18344/) (2024)
- [Towards Explainable Traffic Flow Prediction with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02937/) (2024)
- [VeriPlan: Integrating Formal Verification and LLMs into End-User Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17898/) (2025)
- [FaithLM: Towards Faithful Explanations for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04678/) (2024)
- [Interpretable User Satisfaction Estimation for Conversational Systems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12388/) (2024)
- [V2X-LLM: Enhancing V2X Integration and Understanding in Connected Vehicle Corridors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02239/) (2025)
- [Adversarial Representation Engineering: A General Model Editing Framework for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13752/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00219/) (2024)
- [Multi-Level Explanations for Generative Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14459/) (2024)
- [Interpretability Needs a New Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05386/) (2024)
- [Generative AI for Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06741/) (2024)
- [CheckEmbed: Effective Verification of LLM Solutions to Open-Ended Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02524/) (2024)
- [The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11004/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Analysis of Large Language Model Outputs: Similarity, Diversity, and Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09056/) (2025)
- [Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05451/) (2025)
- [Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15538/) (2025)
- [Characterizing Large Language Models as Rationalizers of Knowledge-intensive Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05085/) (2023)
- [Why Would You Suggest That? Human Trust in Language Model Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02018/) (2024)
- [Unearthing Skill-Level Insights for Understanding Trade-Offs of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13826/) (2024)
- [A Rose by Any Other Name: LLM-Generated Explanations Are Good Proxies for Human Explanations to Collect Label Distributions on NLI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13942/) (2024)
- [From Text to Trust: Empowering AI-assisted Decision Making with Adaptive LLM-powered Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11919/) (2025)
- [Self-AMPLIFY: Improving Small Language Models with Self Post Hoc Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12038/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Responsible Generative AI: What to Generate and What Not](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05783/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have demonstrated superior performance on a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks including sentiment analysis, mathematical reasoning and summarization. Furthermore, since these models are instruction-tuned on human conversations to produce "helpful" responses, they can and often will produce explanations along with the response, which we call self-explanations. For example, when analyzing the sentiment of a movie review, the model may output not only the positivity of the sentiment, but also an explanation (e.g., by listing the sentiment-laden words such as "fantastic" and "memorable" in the review). How good are these automatically generated self-explanations? In this paper, we investigate this question on the task of sentiment analysis and for feature attribution explanation, one of the most commonly studied settings in the interpretability literature (for pre-ChatGPT models). Specifically, we study different ways to elicit the self-explanations, evaluate their faithfulness on a set of evaluation metrics, and compare them to traditional explanation methods such as occlusion or LIME saliency maps. Through an extensive set of experiments, we find that ChatGPT's self-explanations perform on par with traditional ones, but are quite different from them according to various agreement metrics, meanwhile being much cheaper to produce (as they are generated along with the prediction). In addition, we identified several interesting characteristics of them, which prompt us to rethink many current model interpretability practices in the era of ChatGPT(-like) LLMs.