# VeriDIP: Verifying Ownership of Deep Neural Networks through Privacy Leakage Fingerprints

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10656 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10656/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03570/) (2021)
- [Rethinking the Value of Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05270/) (2018)
- [What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03703/) (2020)
- [Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04633/) (2018)
- [White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11229/) (2019)
- [Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10706/) (2021)
- [Deep Neural Network Fingerprinting by Conferrable Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00888/) (2019)
- [ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.09339/) (2020)
- [Imperceptible Adversarial Attacks on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03274/) (2019)
- [DeepSigns: A Generic Watermarking Framework for IP Protection of Deep Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00750/) (2018)
- [Effectiveness of Distillation Attack and Countermeasure on Neural Network Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06046/) (2019)
- [Have You Stolen My Model? Evasion Attacks Against Deep Neural Network Watermarking Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.00615/) (2018)
- [An Empirical Study on the Intrinsic Privacy of SGD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02919/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying Machine Learning as a Service gives rise to model plagiarism, leading to copyright infringement. Ownership testing techniques are designed to identify model fingerprints for verifying plagiarism. However, previous works often rely on overfitting or robustness features as fingerprints, lacking theoretical guarantees and exhibiting under-performance on generalized models. In this paper, we propose a novel ownership testing method called VeriDIP, which verifies a DNN model's intellectual property. VeriDIP makes two major contributions. (1) It utilizes membership inference attacks to estimate the lower bound of privacy leakage, which reflects the fingerprint of a given model. The privacy leakage fingerprints highlight the unique patterns through which the models memorize sensitive training datasets. (2) We introduce a novel approach using less private samples to enhance the performance of ownership testing. Extensive experimental results confirm that VeriDIP is effective and efficient in validating the ownership of deep learning models trained on both image and tabular datasets. VeriDIP achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods on image datasets while significantly reducing computation and communication costs. Enhanced VeriDIP demonstrates superior verification performance on generalized deep learning models, particularly on table-trained models. Additionally, VeriDIP exhibits similar effectiveness on utility-preserving differentially private models compared to non-differentially private baselines.
