# Defect Analysis of 3D Printed Cylinder Object Using Transfer Learning Approaches

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08645 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08645/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07261/) (2016)
- [The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04621/) (2017)
- [Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00489/) (2017)
- [A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.09820/) (2018)
- [Predicting Parameters in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.0543/) (2013)
- [Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.03169/) (2016)
- [Extremely Large Minibatch SGD: Training ResNet-50 on ImageNet in 15 Minutes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04325/) (2017)
- [Study of Different Deep Learning Approach with Explainable AI for Screening Patients with COVID-19 Symptoms: Using CT Scan and Chest X-ray Image Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12525/) (2020)
- [Transfer learning and Local interpretable model agnostic based visual approach in Monkeypox Disease Detection and Classification: A Deep Learning insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05633/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Additive manufacturing (AM) is gaining attention across various industries like healthcare, aerospace, and automotive. However, identifying defects early in the AM process can reduce production costs and improve productivity - a key challenge. This study explored the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) approaches, specifically transfer learning (TL) models, for defect detection in 3D-printed cylinders. Images of cylinders were analyzed using models including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, InceptionResNetV2, and MobileNetV2. Performance was compared across two datasets using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. In the first study, VGG16, InceptionResNetV2, and MobileNetV2 achieved perfect scores. In contrast, ResNet50 had the lowest performance, with an average F1-score of 0.32. Similarly, in the second study, MobileNetV2 correctly classified all instances, while ResNet50 struggled with more false positives and fewer true positives, resulting in an F1-score of 0.75. Overall, the findings suggest certain TL models like MobileNetV2 can deliver high accuracy for AM defect classification, although performance varies across algorithms. The results provide insights into model optimization and integration needs for reliable automated defect analysis during 3D printing. By identifying the top-performing TL techniques, this study aims to enhance AM product quality through robust image-based monitoring and inspection.
