# Impact of Label Types on Training SWIN Models with Overhead Imagery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07572 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07572/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04552/) (2017)
- [ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12231/) (2018)
- [Natural Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07174/) (2019)
- [Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1897/) (2014)
- [DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.10398/) (2017)
- [Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learn](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10178/) (2019)
- [Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09994/) (2020)
- [Object Detection in Optical Remote Sensing Images: A Survey and A New Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00133/) (2019)
- [Object Detection in Aerial Images: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12219/) (2021)
- [iSAID: A Large-scale Dataset for Instance Segmentation in Aerial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12886/) (2019)
- [xView: Objects in Context in Overhead Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07856/) (2018)
- [FAIR1M: A Benchmark Dataset for Fine-grained Object Recognition in High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.05569/) (2021)
- [A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Others](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04825/) (2022)
- [Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification Meets Deep Learning: Challenges, Methods, Benchmarks, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01094/) (2020)
- [A Comprehensive Study of Image Classification Model Sensitivity to Foregrounds, Backgrounds, and Visual Attributes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.10766/) (2022)
- [Towards Robust Classification Model by Counterfactual and Invariant Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01127/) (2021)
- [Achieving Robustness in the Wild via Adversarial Mixing with Disentangled Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03192/) (2019)
- [Fighting Fire with Fire: Avoiding DNN Shortcuts through Priming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10816/) (2022)
- [BshapeNet: Object Detection and Instance Segmentation with Bounding Shape Masks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.10327/) (2018)
- [AutoGeoLabel: Automated Label Generation for Geospatial Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00067/) (2022)
- [Centerpoints Are All You Need in Overhead Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01857/) (2022)
- [On Background Bias in Deep Metric Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01615/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the impact of data set design on model training and performance can help alleviate the costs associated with generating remote sensing and overhead labeled data. This work examined the impact of training shifted window transformers using bounding boxes and segmentation labels, where the latter are more expensive to produce. We examined classification tasks by comparing models trained with both target and backgrounds against models trained with only target pixels, extracted by segmentation labels. For object detection models, we compared performance using either label type when training. We found that the models trained on only target pixels do not show performance improvement for classification tasks, appearing to conflate background pixels in the evaluation set with target pixels. For object detection, we found that models trained with either label type showed equivalent performance across testing. We found that bounding boxes appeared to be sufficient for tasks that did not require more complex labels, such as object segmentation. Continuing work to determine consistency of this result across data types and model architectures could potentially result in substantial savings in generating remote sensing data sets for deep learning.
