# NeuroInspect: Interpretable Neuron-based Debugging Framework through Class-conditional Visualizations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07184 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07184/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03983/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02918/) (2019)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05796/) (2017)
- [Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.09044/) (2021)
- [Dreaming to Distill: Data-free Knowledge Transfer via DeepInversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08795/) (2019)
- [Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.06579/) (2015)
- [Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15480/) (2022)
- [Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.05041/) (2020)
- [On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.07969/) (2019)
- [Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.09304/) (2016)
- [Debugging Tests for Model Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.05429/) (2020)
- [CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10965/) (2022)
- [Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11114/) (2022)
- [TS-CAM: Token Semantic Coupled Attention Map for Weakly Supervised Object Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14862/) (2021)
- [Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.03616/) (2016)
- [Leveraging Sparse Linear Layers for Debuggable Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04857/) (2021)
- [MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06523/) (2022)
- [What do Vision Transformers Learn? A Visual Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06727/) (2022)
- [Discover and Cure: Concept-aware Mitigation of Spurious Correlation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00650/) (2023)
- [Towards falsifiable interpretability research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12016/) (2020)
- [Meaningfully Debugging Model Mistakes using Conceptual Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12723/) (2021)
- [MultiViz: Towards Visualizing and Understanding Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00056/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite deep learning (DL) has achieved remarkable progress in various domains, the DL models are still prone to making mistakes. This issue necessitates effective debugging tools for DL practitioners to interpret the decision-making process within the networks. However, existing debugging methods often demand extra data or adjustments to the decision process, limiting their applicability. To tackle this problem, we present NeuroInspect, an interpretable neuron-based debugging framework with three key stages: counterfactual explanations, feature visualizations, and false correlation mitigation. Our debugging framework first pinpoints neurons responsible for mistakes in the network and then visualizes features embedded in the neurons to be human-interpretable. To provide these explanations, we introduce CLIP-Illusion, a novel feature visualization method that generates images representing features conditioned on classes to examine the connection between neurons and the decision layer. We alleviate convoluted explanations of the conventional visualization approach by employing class information, thereby isolating mixed properties. This process offers more human-interpretable explanations for model errors without altering the trained network or requiring additional data. Furthermore, our framework mitigates false correlations learned from a dataset under a stochastic perspective, modifying decisions for the neurons considered as the main causes. We validate the effectiveness of our framework by addressing false correlations and improving inferences for classes with the worst performance in real-world settings. Moreover, we demonstrate that NeuroInspect helps debug the mistakes of DL models through evaluation for human understanding. The code is openly available at https://github.com/yeongjoonJu/NeuroInspect.