# Evaluating Explanation Methods for Vision-and-Language Navigation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06654 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06654/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06158/) (2017)
- [Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.07280/) (2017)
- [What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.04341/) (2019)
- [Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.09418/) (2019)
- [Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03685/) (2020)
- [ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03429/) (2019)
- [A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10758/) (2018)
- [Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07954/) (2020)
- [Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02724/) (2018)
- [On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09392/) (2019)
- [Reinforced Cross-Modal Matching and Self-Supervised Imitation Learning for Vision-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10092/) (2018)
- [A Recurrent Vision-and-Language BERT for Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13922/) (2020)
- [Learning to Navigate Unseen Environments: Back Translation with Environmental Dropout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04195/) (2019)
- [Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11326/) (2022)
- [Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.07913/) (2019)
- [Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.06693/) (2020)
- [The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.00786/) (2021)
- [Object-and-Action Aware Model for Visual Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14626/) (2020)
- [Vision-Language Navigation with Random Environmental Mixup](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07876/) (2021)
- [Are You Looking? Grounding to Multiple Modalities in Vision-and-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00347/) (2019)
- [Active Visual Information Gathering for Vision-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08037/) (2020)
- [Extraction of Salient Sentences from Labelled Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6815/) (2014)
- [Transferable Representation Learning in Vision-and-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03409/) (2019)
- [ADAPT: Vision-Language Navigation with Modality-Aligned Action Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15509/) (2022)
- [Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05656/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Saliency Methods for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05824/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24576/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to navigate robots with natural language instructions in an unknown environment is a crucial step for achieving embodied artificial intelligence (AI). With the improving performance of deep neural models proposed in the field of vision-and-language navigation (VLN), it is equally interesting to know what information the models utilize for their decision-making in the navigation tasks. To understand the inner workings of deep neural models, various explanation methods have been developed for promoting explainable AI (XAI). But they are mostly applied to deep neural models for image or text classification tasks and little work has been done in explaining deep neural models for VLN tasks. In this paper, we address these problems by building quantitative benchmarks to evaluate explanation methods for VLN models in terms of faithfulness. We propose a new erasure-based evaluation pipeline to measure the step-wise textual explanation in the sequential decision-making setting. We evaluate several explanation methods for two representative VLN models on two popular VLN datasets and reveal valuable findings through our experiments.
