# An Investigation of LLMs' Inefficacy in Understanding Converse Relations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05163 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05163/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03975/) (2016)
- [Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.01476/) (2017)
- [BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08193/) (2021)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12288/) (2023)
- [Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00720/) (2022)
- [KEPLER: A Unified Model for Knowledge Embedding and Pre-trained Language Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06136/) (2019)
- [True Few-Shot Learning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.11447/) (2021)
- [Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07355/) (2019)
- [Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09479/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04108/) (2020)
- [Learning Sequence Encoders for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.03202/) (2018)
- [An Empirical Study on Robustness to Spurious Correlations using Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06778/) (2020)
- [One-Shot Relational Learning for Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09040/) (2018)
- [Inverse scaling can become U-shaped](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02011/) (2022)
- [Exposing Attention Glitches with Flip-Flop Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00946/) (2023)
- [The Larger They Are, the Harder They Fail: Language Models do not Recognize Identifier Swaps in Python](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15507/) (2023)
- [ASDOT: Any-Shot Data-to-Text Generation with Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04325/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Before Generation, Align it! A Novel and Effective Strategy for Mitigating Hallucinations in Text-to-SQL Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15307/) (2024)
- [Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the 'Reversal Curse' via Training Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04669/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model Reasoning Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06176/) (2026)
- [Chain of History: Learning and Forecasting with LLMs for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06072/) (2024)
- [Shortcut Learning in In-Context Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.02018/) (2024)
- [Generative Subgraph Retrieval for Knowledge Graph-Grounded Dialog Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09350/) (2024)
- [Unveiling the Mechanisms of Multi-Hop Reasoning in Transformers via Identity Bridge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24653/) (2025)
- [The quasi-semantic competence of LLMs: a case study on the part-whole relation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02395/) (2025)
- [Reversing Arrows in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.03512/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in many formal language oriented tasks, such as structural data-to-text and semantic parsing. However current benchmarks mostly follow the data distribution of the pre-training data of LLMs. Therefore, a natural question rises that do LLMs really understand the structured semantics of formal languages. In this paper, we investigate this problem on a special case, converse binary relation. We introduce a new benchmark ConvRe focusing on converse relations, which contains 17 relations and 1240 triples extracted from popular knowledge graph completion datasets. Our ConvRE features two tasks, Re2Text and Text2Re, which are formulated as multi-choice question answering to evaluate LLMs' ability to determine the matching between relations and associated text. For the evaluation protocol, apart from different prompting methods, we further introduce variants to the test text and few-shot example text. We conduct experiments on three popular LLM families and have observed various scaling trends. The results suggest that LLMs often resort to shortcut learning and still face challenges on our proposed benchmark.
