# Modeling motor control in continuous-time Active Inference: a survey

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05144 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05144/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Deep hybrid models: infer and plan in a dynamic world](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10088/) (2024)
- [Dynamic planning in hierarchical active inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11658/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The way the brain selects and controls actions is still widely debated. Mainstream approaches based on Optimal Control focus on stimulus-response mappings that optimize cost functions. Ideomotor theory and cybernetics propose a different perspective: they suggest that actions are selected and controlled by activating action effects and by continuously matching internal predictions with sensations. Active Inference offers a modern formulation of these ideas, in terms of inferential mechanisms and prediction-error-based control, which can be linked to neural mechanisms of living organisms. This article provides a technical illustration of Active Inference models in continuous time and a brief survey of Active Inference models that solve four kinds of control problems; namely, the control of goal-directed reaching movements, active sensing, the resolution of multisensory conflict during movement and the integration of decision-making and motor control. Crucially, in Active Inference, all these different facets of motor control emerge from the same optimization process - namely, the minimization of Free Energy - and do not require designing separate cost functions. Therefore, Active Inference provides a unitary perspective on various aspects of motor control that can inform both the study of biological control mechanisms and the design of artificial and robotic systems.