# EcoAssistant: Using LLM Assistant More Affordably and Accurately

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03046 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03046/

## Key facts

- Cited by 49 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05176/) (2023)
- [Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00051/) (2017)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00300/) (2019)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [Learning to Compress Prompts with Gist Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08467/) (2023)
- [GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desire](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04166/) (2023)
- [Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03314/) (2023)
- [InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14898/) (2023)
- [Cost-Effective Hyperparameter Optimization for Large Language Model Generation Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04673/) (2023)
- [LeanContext: Cost-Efficient Domain-Specific Question Answering Using LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00841/) (2023)
- [BatchPrompt: Accomplish more with less](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00384/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00212/) (2025)
- [Agent KB: Leveraging Cross-Domain Experience for Agentic Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06229/) (2025)
- [Pearl: Personalizing Large Language Model Writing Assistants with Generation-Calibrated Retrievers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09180/) (2023)
- [Harnessing Multiple Large Language Models: A Survey on LLM Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18036/) (2025)
- [EHRAgent: Code Empowers Large Language Models for Few-shot Complex Tabular Reasoning on Electronic Health Records](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07128/) (2024)
- [Learning to Route LLMs with Confidence Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13284/) (2024)
- [Model Compression and Efficient Inference for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09748/) (2024)
- [RouterEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Routing LLMs to Explore Model-level Scaling Up in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10657/) (2025)
- [A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19676/) (2025)
- [Adaptive In-conversation Team Building for Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19425/) (2024)
- [m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11085/) (2024)
- [Agent Design Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Architectural Patterns for Foundation Model based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10467/) (2024)
- [CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02734/) (2025)
- [Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02419/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models for Manufacturing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21418/) (2024)
- [Multi-Layer Transformers Gradient Can be Approximated in Almost Linear Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13233/) (2024)
- [Doing More with Less: A Survey on Routing Strategies for Resource Optimisation in Large Language Model-Based Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.00409/) (2025)
- [Automatic Failure Attribution and Critical Step Prediction Method for Multi-Agent Systems Based on Causal Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08682/) (2025)
- [Interactive Speculative Planning: Enhance Agent Efficiency through Co-design of System and User Interface](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00079/) (2024)
- [CigaR: Cost-efficient Program Repair with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06598/) (2024)
- [The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22862/) (2026)
- [Inference-Time Budget Control for LLM Search Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05701/) (2026)
- [Advancing the Search Frontier with AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01235/) (2023)
- [Dynamic Speculative Agent Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01920/) (2025)
- [EcoAct: Economic Agent Determines When to Register What Action](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01643/) (2024)
- [Spend Less, Reason Better: Budget-Aware Value Tree Search for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12634/) (2026)
- [Task-Aware LLM Routing with Multi-Level Task-Profile-Guided Data Synthesis for Cold-Start Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09377/) (2026)
- [Affordable Generative Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02053/) (2024)
- [Enabling Weak LLMs to Judge Response Reliability via Meta Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12146/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Today, users ask Large language models (LLMs) as assistants to answer queries that require external knowledge; they ask about the weather in a specific city, about stock prices, and even about where specific locations are within their neighborhood. These queries require the LLM to produce code that invokes external APIs to answer the user's question, yet LLMs rarely produce correct code on the first try, requiring iterative code refinement upon execution results. In addition, using LLM assistants to support high query volumes can be expensive. In this work, we contribute a framework, EcoAssistant, that enables LLMs to answer code-driven queries more affordably and accurately. EcoAssistant contains three components. First, it allows the LLM assistants to converse with an automatic code executor to iteratively refine code or to produce answers based on the execution results. Second, we use a hierarchy of LLM assistants, which attempts to answer the query with weaker, cheaper LLMs before backing off to stronger, expensive ones. Third, we retrieve solutions from past successful queries as in-context demonstrations to help subsequent queries. Empirically, we show that EcoAssistant offers distinct advantages for affordability and accuracy, surpassing GPT-4 by 10 points of success rate with less than 50% of GPT-4's cost.