# Jury: A Comprehensive Evaluation Toolkit

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02040 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02040/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08771/) (2018)
- [Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.08144/) (2016)
- [Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02846/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.12009/) (2020)
- [Relevance of Unsupervised Metrics in Task-Oriented Dialogue for Evaluating Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.09799/) (2017)
- [Neural Quality Estimation with Multiple Hypotheses for Grammatical Error Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04443/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [XRAG: eXamining the Core -- Benchmarking Foundational Components in Advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15529/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation plays a critical role in deep learning as a fundamental block of any prediction-based system. However, the vast number of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks and the development of various metrics have led to challenges in evaluating different systems with different metrics. To address these challenges, we introduce jury, a toolkit that provides a unified evaluation framework with standardized structures for performing evaluation across different tasks and metrics. The objective of jury is to standardize and improve metric evaluation for all systems and aid the community in overcoming the challenges in evaluation. Since its open-source release, jury has reached a wide audience and is available at https://github.com/obss/jury.