# Large Language Models as Analogical Reasoners

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01714 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01714/

## Key facts

- Cited by 107 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 70 of its 135 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 70)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03350/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 107)

- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04109/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10200/) (2024)
- [MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11403/) (2024)
- [LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Provers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15164/) (2023)
- [Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03620/) (2024)
- [Buffer of Thoughts: Thought-Augmented Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04271/) (2024)
- [Atom of Thoughts for Markov LLM Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12018/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Prompt Engineering Methods in Large Language Models for Different NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12994/) (2024)
- [Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01940/) (2024)
- [ReGAL: Refactoring Programs to Discover Generalizable Abstractions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16467/) (2024)
- [The Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models on Human Expression and Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01491/) (2025)
- [Generative to Agentic AI: Survey, Conceptualization, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18875/) (2025)
- [CODESIM: Multi-Agent Code Generation and Problem Solving through Simulation-Driven Planning and Debugging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05664/) (2025)
- [AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16802/) (2024)
- [MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13975/) (2024)
- [Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11698/) (2024)
- [SPRIG: Improving Large Language Model Performance by System Prompt Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14826/) (2024)
- [Improving Physics Reasoning in Large Language Models Using Mixture of Refinement Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00821/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17088/) (2025)
- [Quantifying the Capabilities of LLMs across Scale and Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03146/) (2024)
- [Auto-ICL: In-Context Learning without Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09263/) (2023)
- [Learning Global Hypothesis Space for Enhancing Synergistic Reasoning Chain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09794/) (2026)
- [When Thinking Drifts: Evidential Grounding for Robust Video Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06077/) (2025)
- [Learning From Correctness Without Prompting Makes LLM Efficient Reasoner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19094/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Autonomous Cyber Defenders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04843/) (2025)
- [Compositional Translation: A Novel LLM-based Approach for Low-resource Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04554/) (2025)
- [Limits of Transformer Language Models on Learning to Compose Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05785/) (2024)
- [AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12370/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Contrastive Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08211/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting for language models demonstrates impressive performance across reasoning tasks, but typically needs labeled exemplars of the reasoning process. In this work, we introduce a new prompting approach, analogical prompting, designed to automatically guide the reasoning process of large language models. Inspired by analogical reasoning, a cognitive process in which humans draw from relevant past experiences to tackle new problems, our approach prompts language models to self-generate relevant exemplars or knowledge in the context, before proceeding to solve the given problem. This method presents several advantages: it obviates the need for labeling or retrieving exemplars, offering generality and convenience; it can also tailor the generated exemplars and knowledge to each problem, offering adaptability. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms 0-shot CoT and manual few-shot CoT in a variety of reasoning tasks, including math problem solving in GSM8K and MATH, code generation in Codeforces, and other reasoning tasks in BIG-Bench.