# Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00280 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00280/

## Key facts

- Cited by 70 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 86 of its 119 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 86)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00937/) (2018)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 70)

- [SeeClick: Harnessing GUI Grounding for Advanced Visual GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10935/) (2024)
- [OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23218/) (2024)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [GUI-R1 : A Generalist R1-Style Vision-Language Action Model For GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10458/) (2025)
- [OS-Copilot: Towards Generalist Computer Agents with Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07456/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14294/) (2024)
- [OS-Genesis: Automating GUI Agent Trajectory Construction via Reverse Task Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19723/) (2024)
- [Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02506/) (2024)
- [Exploring Large Language Model based Intelligent Agents: Definitions, Methods, and Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03428/) (2024)
- [G-Designer: Architecting Multi-agent Communication Topologies via Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11782/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models Can Self-Improve Reasoning via Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00855/) (2024)
- [GroupDebate: Enhancing the Efficiency of Multi-Agent Debate Using Group Discussion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14051/) (2024)
- [The Dawn of GUI Agent: A Preliminary Case Study with Claude 3.5 Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10323/) (2024)
- [Learning to Use Tools via Cooperative and Interactive Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03031/) (2024)
- [ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19897/) (2025)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08152/) (2023)
- [Symbol-LLM: Towards Foundational Symbol-centric Interface For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09278/) (2023)
- [LLM as OS, Agents as Apps: Envisioning AIOS, Agents and the AIOS-Agent Ecosystem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03815/) (2023)
- [On the Efficacy of Eviction Policy for Key-Value Constrained Generative Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06262/) (2024)
- [Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11035/) (2025)
- [FilMaster: Bridging Cinematic Principles and Generative AI for Automated Film Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18899/) (2025)
- [AgentStore: Scalable Integration of Heterogeneous Agents As Specialized Generalist Computer Assistant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18603/) (2024)
- [Multi-Agent Large Language Models for Conversational Task-Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22932/) (2024)
- [Stay Focused: Problem Drift in Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19559/) (2025)
- [Collective Critics for Creative Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02428/) (2024)
- [MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07672/) (2024)
- [S2-MAD: Breaking the Token Barrier to Enhance Multi-Agent Debate Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04790/) (2025)
- [OS-Symphony: A Holistic Framework for Robust and Generalist Computer-Using Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07779/) (2026)
- [BattleAgent: Multi-modal Dynamic Emulation on Historical Battles to Complement Historical Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15532/) (2024)
- [OS-Sentinel: Towards Safety-Enhanced Mobile GUI Agents via Hybrid Validation in Realistic Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24411/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving at an unprecedented pace and have exhibited considerable capability in the realm of natural language processing (NLP) with world knowledge. Benefiting from ultra-large-scale training corpora, a single LLM can manage typical NLP tasks competently. However, its performance in executing reasoning tasks is still confined by the limitations of its internal representations. To push this boundary further, we introduce Corex in this paper, a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform LLMs into autonomous agents pioneering multi-model collaborations for complex task-solving. Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes, which collectively work towards enhancing the factuality, faithfulness, and reliability of the reasoning process. These paradigms foster task-agnostic approaches that enable LLMs to ''think outside the box,'' thereby overcoming hallucinations and providing better solutions. Through extensive experiments across four different types of reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods. Further results and in-depth analysis demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of our method, facilitating collaboration among different LLMs and promoting annotation efficiency.