# EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteria

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13633 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13633/

## Key facts

- Cited by 74 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 59 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 59)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.13586/) (2021)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.06023/) (2016)
- [LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16199/) (2023)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06899/) (2022)
- [AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14387/) (2023)
- [Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01937/) (2023)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desire](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04166/) (2023)
- [Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03047/) (2023)
- [Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.04024/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 74)

- [Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12272/) (2024)
- [Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06591/) (2024)
- [A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04069/) (2024)
- [LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01383/) (2024)
- [Roleplay-doh: Enabling Domain-Experts to Create LLM-simulated Patients via Eliciting and Adhering to Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00870/) (2024)
- [Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02068/) (2025)
- [LAVE: LLM-Powered Agent Assistance and Language Augmentation for Video Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10294/) (2024)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07103/) (2024)
- [Are LLM-based Evaluators Confusing NLG Quality Criteria?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12055/) (2024)
- [How Far Are We From AGI: Are LLMs All We Need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10313/) (2024)
- [LLM Comparator: Visual Analytics for Side-by-Side Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10524/) (2024)
- [Learning to Refine with Fine-Grained Natural Language Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02397/) (2024)
- [TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated Students](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04078/) (2024)
- [What Should We Engineer in Prompts? Training Humans in Requirement-Driven LLM Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.08775/) (2024)
- [CUPID: Evaluating Personalized and Contextualized Alignment of LLMs from Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01674/) (2025)
- [SPADE: Synthesizing Data Quality Assertions for Large Language Model Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03038/) (2024)
- [GhostWriter: Augmenting Collaborative Human-AI Writing Experiences Through Personalization and Agency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08855/) (2024)
- [Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09264/) (2024)
- [What Makes a Good Story and How Can We Measure It? A Comprehensive Survey of Story Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14622/) (2024)
- [Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12557/) (2025)
- [VeriLA: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Interpretable Verification of LLM Agent Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12651/) (2025)
- [Beyond the Comfort Zone: Emerging Solutions to Overcome Challenges in Integrating LLMs into Software Products](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12071/) (2024)
- [SPHERE: An Evaluation Card for Human-AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07971/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Exaggerated Safety in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05418/) (2024)
- [Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14591/) (2025)
- [DiLLS: Interactive Diagnosis of LLM-based Multi-agent Systems via Layered Summary of Agent Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05446/) (2026)
- [ChainBuddy: An AI Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13588/) (2024)
- [C2: Scalable Auto-Feedback for LLM-based Chart Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18652/) (2024)
- [PROMPTEVALS: A Dataset of Assertions and Guardrails for Custom Production Large Language Model Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14738/) (2025)
- [Self-Improving Customer Review Response Generation Based on LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03845/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

By simply composing prompts, developers can prototype novel generative applications with Large Language Models (LLMs). To refine prototypes into products, however, developers must iteratively revise prompts by evaluating outputs to diagnose weaknesses. Formative interviews (N=8) revealed that developers invest significant effort in manually evaluating outputs as they assess context-specific and subjective criteria. We present EvalLM, an interactive system for iteratively refining prompts by evaluating multiple outputs on user-defined criteria. By describing criteria in natural language, users can employ the system's LLM-based evaluator to get an overview of where prompts excel or fail, and improve these based on the evaluator's feedback. A comparative study (N=12) showed that EvalLM, when compared to manual evaluation, helped participants compose more diverse criteria, examine twice as many outputs, and reach satisfactory prompts with 59% fewer revisions. Beyond prompts, our work can be extended to augment model evaluation and alignment in specific application contexts.