# Distribution-Aware Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13604 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13604/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01685/) (2016)
- [SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.15203/) (2021)
- [Visual Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12119/) (2022)
- [Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02530/) (2019)
- [Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08546/) (2020)
- [AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13535/) (2022)
- [Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13591/) (2022)
- [Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12400/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15361/) (2023)
- [Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07830/) (2019)
- [Contrastive Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10377/) (2022)
- [Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05718/) (2022)
- [Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13899/) (2023)
- [SHIFT: A Synthetic Driving Dataset for Continuous Multi-Task Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08367/) (2022)
- [EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01904/) (2023)
- [Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13081/) (2022)
- [Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04145/) (2022)
- [Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04831/) (2022)
- [MM-TTA: Multi-Modal Test-Time Adaptation for 3D Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12667/) (2022)
- [ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04344/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty-guided Source-free Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07591/) (2022)
- [BEV-SAN: Accurate BEV 3D Object Detection via Slice Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.01231/) (2022)
- [Cloud-Device Collaborative Adaptation to Continual Changing Environments in the Real-world](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00972/) (2022)
- [Unsupervised Spike Depth Estimation via Cross-modality Cross-domain Knowledge Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12527/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Continual-MAE: Adaptive Distribution Masked Autoencoders for Continual Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12480/) (2023)
- [Unified Language-driven Zero-shot Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07155/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11491/) (2024)
- [Decomposing the Neurons: Activation Sparsity via Mixture of Experts for Continual Test Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16486/) (2024)
- [Controllable Continual Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14602/) (2024)
- [Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Object Detection with Adaptive Monitoring and Randomized Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16439/) (2024)
- [Few Clicks Suffice: Active Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01835/) (2023)
- [Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08164/) (2026)
- [MoASE++: Mixture of Activation Sparsity Experts with Domain-Adaptive On-policy Distillation for Continual Test Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17743/) (2026)
- [Towards Continual Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models in Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29923/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Since autonomous driving systems usually face dynamic and ever-changing environments, continual test-time adaptation (CTTA) has been proposed as a strategy for transferring deployed models to continually changing target domains. However, the pursuit of long-term adaptation often introduces catastrophic forgetting and error accumulation problems, which impede the practical implementation of CTTA in the real world. Recently, existing CTTA methods mainly focus on utilizing a majority of parameters to fit target domain knowledge through self-training. Unfortunately, these approaches often amplify the challenge of error accumulation due to noisy pseudo-labels, and pose practical limitations stemming from the heavy computational costs associated with entire model updates. In this paper, we propose a distribution-aware tuning (DAT) method to make the semantic segmentation CTTA efficient and practical in real-world applications. DAT adaptively selects and updates two small groups of trainable parameters based on data distribution during the continual adaptation process, including domain-specific parameters (DSP) and task-relevant parameters (TRP). Specifically, DSP exhibits sensitivity to outputs with substantial distribution shifts, effectively mitigating the problem of error accumulation. In contrast, TRP are allocated to positions that are responsive to outputs with minor distribution shifts, which are fine-tuned to avoid the catastrophic forgetting problem. In addition, since CTTA is a temporal task, we introduce the Parameter Accumulation Update (PAU) strategy to collect the updated DSP and TRP in target domain sequences. We conduct extensive experiments on two widely-used semantic segmentation CTTA benchmarks, achieving promising performance compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.